Leaderboard

Knn I was wondering why Harris head got a plaster .. then zoom in realise is a bottle of lube on e bed

Boom boom shakalaka mmm

@noobmaster @ExTreMisTxxx @CannotTahanLiao @classyNfabulous @canot_lidat_lah

Quick research shows kampong, as expected of kampong, has a big family. she is sister number 3 and has a little brother. wonder if her sisters tits are just as delicious mmm

@ManOfTheHour @classyNfabulous @CannotTahanLiao @canot_lidat_lah @ExTreMisTxxx

moi ish will bring them to pizza hut for Hawaiian pizza

Victim relieved to prove this ridiculous crime actually happened. We live in an age flooded with viral content and so many people vying for a bit of Internet fame that they try to concoct increasingly absurd videos which sometimes blur the lines between reality and fiction. This unfortunately makes our BS detectors so sensitive that we can easily dismiss actual outlandish events as hoaxes. Such a case happened last October in which a team of bumbling thieves stole a smartphone that was in the middle of a livestream and broadcasted their entire crime to the world. Honestly, “bumbling” is putting it mildly, because the criminals were so accidentally well-documented by themselves that the video almost looked professionally made. As a result, for nearly half a year, the victim had to deal with countless accusations that the whole thing was a hoax. To recap what happened, the victim was walking in Yokohama at night while intoxicated when he decided to start up a livestream. However, his condition got the better of him and he dozed off on the street with his stream still running. He was snoozing online for about 12 minutes when suddenly a hand reached into the frame and plucked the man’s wallet from his bag. The theft did little to rouse the drunken man, who continued to sleep for about an hour. It was at that time that nearby security cameras picked up the thief coming back and snatching the smartphone that was livestreaming the man. The thief then got into a van driven by an accomplice with the phone still livestreaming. At one point the thief remarked that the phone appeared to be doing something and later on wondered out loud whether it was recording them, but proceeded to do nothing about it. All the while, everything they said and even the audio directions from the car’s navigation system were letting everyone in on where they were and what they were doing. Then, still on camera and with his face nicely framed, the thief called another accomplice and told him he was bringing some stolen goods. The audience of this livestream, which at some points reached 80 viewers, then watched as the thief entered a hotel and knocked on the door of Room 803. I know this because even the room number is easily seen in the video. The thief then put the still-broadcasting phone on a table with the camera facing up and both men’s faces are so perfectly framed you’d think Tarantino himself set up the shot. They went through the victim’s wallet and the thief explained that there wasn’t any cash but it had a card that he could use to buy some cigarettes at a convenience store. They then turned to the phone and as the accomplice looked at it, he remarked, “I wonder if it’s locked. It’s says something like ‘reporting [to the police]…'” After that, the thief responded with an almost Looney-Tunes-like comedic precision, “O-O-Online?!” just before the video feed finally stopped about 90 minutes after the theft occurred. Needless to say, the authorities had ample evidence to work with and recently arrested all three men both for this crime as well as another theft that same month from an apartment in Yokohama. They were all between the ages of 47 and 50 and judging by the rather formal way the thief talked to the others, it may even have been a part of a more organized ring. After the arrests, the victim spoke to the media and expressed his relief that his story was finally vindicated. During the livestream and afterward on social media, there were numerous comments of “This has got to be a put-on,” “This can’t be real,” and “This is a joke, right?” However, the victim could only put up with it all until he had the proof in the form of the arrests. He described the time after as frustrating and feeling like he had a chip on his shoulder both from being victimized and not being believed about it. Now, he says it’s like a weight has been lifted and he expressed his gratitude towards the police. https://soranews24.com/2024/02/16/three-men-arrested-after-accidentally-livestreaming-own-crime-for-90-minutes/

@ManOfTheHour @zendude knn this pic really bky, esp Juin From left to right: Manly Jesseca Ah Gua cosplaying PLL Ok as long as she doesn't stand up Dark skinned kampung girl

@noobmaster @ExTreMisTxxx @CannotTahanLiao @classyNfabulous @canot_lidat_lah

@noobmaster @ExTreMisTxxx @CannotTahanLiao @classyNfabulous @canot_lidat_lah

if u wanna talk to me about cai png must remember call me cai png emperor

The Straits Times editor says Government interference doesn’t exist in podcast The Straits Times (ST) editor Jaime Ho has denied that there is Government interference or censorship in the newsroom. Speaking in a livestream on 14 Feb that’s hosted by Walid Jumblatt Abdullah, an Assistant Professor at Nanyang Technological University’s School of Social Sciences, Mr Ho said: “Is there censorship? No, don’t be silly, no. There is no censorship.” He added: “I don’t think people have the time for that anyway, even if they wanted to.” Mr Ho was responding to Prof Walid’s question on whether there is censorship from the Government or some form of self-censorship in place. The hour-long livestream, which is episode 76 of Prof Walid’s ‘Teh Tarik with Walid’ series, can also be found on Spotify as a podcast. Different newsrooms have different relationships On whether the publication is independent, Mr Ho said: “The newsroom for sure would like to believe that we’re as independent as can be.” Source: LinkedIn However, newsrooms exist in very specific contexts, and there are many different newsrooms around the world with different ways of working, he pointed out. “We are just one of them.” All newsrooms “have different relationships” with various newsmakers and stakeholders, including the Government, he said. Their relationship is one that’s fluid, where conversations take place. “We listen to them; they listen to us. Sometimes they have feedback for us, sometimes we have feedback for them,” he said. However, he does not think this translates to censorship. Singapore has long come under fire for its supposed “non-existent” freedom of the press. The nation has consistently ranked low in the Reporters Without Borders (RSF) index. The folks behind RSF is of the view that Singapore’s media laws breach media freedom; RSF also said that self-censorship is widespread among the media in the country. A WikiLeaks document from 2011 also asserted “pressure” put on ST staff “to ensure that the paper’s domestic coverage follows the government line”. Why, asked Prof Walid, is there a prevailing belief that there is censorship within the media, despite Mr Ho’s assertion that there is none? “If they want to have a discussion about what is the Government’s influence on us, I think that’s a fair enough discussion,” he replied. “But to go into the realm of actual censorship, I think that’s putting it a bit too far.” Source: Instagram Relationship between ST and Government has evolved Mr Ho acknowledged that ST was once deemed “the paper of record”, adding that he can’t deny the paper and the Government has had a relationship. However, it has evolved through the years. “I would like to believe some of it comes from a certain degree of trust from both sides… again, there’s no point denying it.” He cited statistics such as that of Reuters Institute, which still shows a high degree of trust in Singapore’s mainstream media outlets, such as ST. Mr Ho also noted a high level of trust in the Government. “If you look at other measures of trust in the Government and society’s trust in the Government, it is also quite high. Higher than most places. If you look at that as a whole, it frames the tone of the relationship between us and the Government.” While people may say that is therefore translated to “some degree of influence” or censorship, he disagrees that that’s the case. Self-censorship is in the eye of the beholder, says ST editor On whether the paper exercises self-censorship, Mr Ho said that is “in the eye of the beholder”. He prefers to see it as the paper being extra cautious and having additional levels of checks and verifications, as it holds itself to “different standards” compared to others. Source: Instagram “Every newsroom makes editorial judgments… some may see that one is different from the other in the name of something else,” he added. “To say that is self-censorship is slightly unfair, but I think it’s a discussion worth having.” Mr Ho said he’d rather have discussions about the quality of journalism, such as how specific stories are dealt with, why they came up with a particular headline or took longer than others to cover an event, rather than being quick to write instances off as self-censorship. Asked why some articles look like a regurgitation of Government press releases, Mr Ho said: “I think we underestimate the size and looming presence that Governance has in Singapore. Let’s be honest with you. The number of press releases, the number of Government policy announcements we get — the size of our Government is getting larger, the place it has in our society is getting larger.” What this means for the news cycle, he explained, is there’s a ton of information released every day. Faced with a barrage of news, and with finite resources, sometimes that’s just the way it is, he said. “Yes, sometimes the language is clunky, I admit — we can do better… at editing, at writing, we can improve as journalists. All of this is fair.” Before being appointed ST’s editor in October 2022, Mr Ho was chief editor of CNA Digital between January 2016 and April 2022. Before joining CNA, Mr Ho held various positions at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA), including Deputy Director of the Climate Change Office, Deputy Permanent Representative of the Permanent Mission of Singapore to the World Trade Organisation in Geneva, and Deputy Director of Public Affairs. You can watch the full ‘Teh Tarik With Walid’ episode on Instagram or listen to it on Spotify. https://mustsharenews.com/straits-times-editor-no-censorship/

tis 3p thingy is sibei jialatzzzz

this should be in 'a laugh a day' thread...

Hamas are heroes. Their avengers. Except is using human shield not vibranirum.

I have no issue with them criticising Israel. What's fucked up is that they are genuinely supporting Hamas. That's why they're angry at govt for branding them as terrorists. Truly one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. Both sides are evil, plain and simple.

Jialat. @classyNfabulous beCUM very naughty liao. Wahahahahahahah

@noobmaster @ExTreMisTxxx @CannotTahanLiao @classyNfabulous @canot_lidat_lah

@noobmaster @ExTreMisTxxx @CannotTahanLiao @classyNfabulous @canot_lidat_lah

This side profile is exactly this

Cute siambu airing pits

No need to censor, they already well trained after so many years. Is like how you see some ppl walk dog without leash one. The dog just follow.

don’t look dead to me @ExTreMisTxxx

still a moonie

Since you all like Mexin. Here's specky Meixin kym? @ManOfTheHour @zendude @noobmaster @coffeenut @CannotTahanLiao @ExTreMisTxxx

He didn't ask in texas accent mah.

@coffeenut @ManOfTheHour @classyNfabulous @HarrisY1 @The_King eat amdk meepok with lots of healthy veggie

Everyday Sunday for him

@noobmaster @ExTreMisTxxx @CannotTahanLiao @classyNfabulous @canot_lidat_lah

@noobmaster @ExTreMisTxxx @CannotTahanLiao @classyNfabulous @canot_lidat_lah

For me is bring French colleagues to delifrance

Wah Xuan Xuan looks hot in that pic mmm

Mmm this auntie’s armpit looks well seasoned and flavourful

@noobmaster new dp is 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼 supporting PWD 👍🏻

u want protest can only protest in small space bodoh

Dbl standard lo

@noobmaster @ExTreMisTxxx @CannotTahanLiao @classyNfabulous @canot_lidat_lah

@noobmaster @ExTreMisTxxx @CannotTahanLiao @classyNfabulous @canot_lidat_lah

They left out the fact is hamas started first, fire few thousands missile kill lot of ppl As such I dont see anything wrong for them defending themself

What’s a moonie?

Dunno why but the apple tan name reminded me of the appleyum and other apple* usernames on hwz that went after insurance companies and agents

Another classic mx pic, think from 20 years ago

getting cancer nao!

Maybe this is like .. "we're giving you $20 that you can't spend anywhere else, so buy something worth $35 and spend $15" Liddat atleast get them to open their wallet liao