ManOfTheHour Posted April 19, 2020 Share Posted April 19, 2020 SINGAPORE - Claims made on several online posts that Temasek Holdings chief executive and executive director Ho Ching's annual salary is around $100 million are false, the Government has said. It has prompted Finance Minister Heng Swee Keat to instruct the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (Pofma) office to issue four correction directions on Sunday (April 19). These are to The Online Citizen's Facebook page and website, The Temasek Review's Facebook page, HardwareZone user "darksiedluv" and opposition politician and lawyer Lim Tean for sharing the falsehood on his Facebook page. https://www.straitstimes.com/business/temasek-holdings-rebuts-claims-that-ho-chings-salary-is-around-100-million 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homelander Posted April 19, 2020 Share Posted April 19, 2020 How come never issue to the taiwan talkshow? I thot they started this? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
socrates469bc Posted April 19, 2020 Share Posted April 19, 2020 then disclose her salary and the salaries of the board and senior management like other plcs. nb, salaries of senior management of gic and other statutory boards must be disclosed as well to ensure transparency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huat Zai Posted April 19, 2020 Share Posted April 19, 2020 you're lying because I say you're lying. It's actually higher than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Satki Posted April 19, 2020 Share Posted April 19, 2020 Interesting distraction. Will lim tean fight or cave in again? Helping a friend to gain more subscribers. He is quite a talented music creator. Look for "Thee Influence" in Youtube Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_King Posted April 19, 2020 Share Posted April 19, 2020 errr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aaur4man Posted April 19, 2020 Share Posted April 19, 2020 Scary Sia this pofma Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_King Posted April 19, 2020 Share Posted April 19, 2020 it is scary. that is why i love bills of right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_King Posted April 19, 2020 Share Posted April 19, 2020 The amendments, known as the Bill of Rights, were designed to protect the basic rights of U.S. citizens, guaranteeing the freedom of speech, press, assembly, and exercise of religion; the right to fair legal procedure and to bear arms; and that powers not delegated to the federal government were reserved for the states and the people. The Bill of Rights – Text Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. Amendment II A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. Amendment III No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law. Amendment IV The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. Amendment V No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. Amendment VI In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense. Amendment VII In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law. Amendment VIII Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. Amendment IX The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. Amendment X The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huat Zai Posted April 19, 2020 Share Posted April 19, 2020 3 minutes ago, The_King said: The amendments, known as the Bill of Rights, were designed to protect the basic rights of U.S. citizens, guaranteeing the freedom of speech, press, assembly, and exercise of religion; the right to fair legal procedure and to bear arms; and that powers not delegated to the federal government were reserved for the states and the people. The Bill of Rights – Text Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. Amendment II A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. Amendment III No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law. Amendment IV The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. Amendment V No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. Amendment VI In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense. Amendment VII In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law. Amendment VIII Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. Amendment IX The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. Amendment X The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_King Posted April 19, 2020 Share Posted April 19, 2020 4 minutes ago, Huat Zai said: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Standing Birdy Posted April 19, 2020 Share Posted April 19, 2020 8 minutes ago, The_King said: MURICA!! 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meng.huat Posted April 19, 2020 Share Posted April 19, 2020 can challenge this POFMA? How they proof they are not right? can they GPGT her income tax or pay slip lo... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ManOfTheHour Posted April 19, 2020 Author Share Posted April 19, 2020 5 hours ago, Homelander said: How come never issue to the taiwan talkshow? I thot they started this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meng.huat Posted April 20, 2020 Share Posted April 20, 2020 6 hours ago, ManOfTheHour said: this will be answered by the PAP wall of silence. I think LT might be the next PAP target, after tang liang hong and CSJ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aaur4man Posted April 20, 2020 Share Posted April 20, 2020 @The_King well not really https://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/us-judge-blocks-twitters-bid-to-reveal-government-requests-for-surveillance?xtor=CS3-20&utm_source=STiPad&utm_medium=share&utm_term=2020-04-19 6%3A04%3A33 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_King Posted April 20, 2020 Share Posted April 20, 2020 15 minutes ago, aaur4man said: @The_King well not really https://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/us-judge-blocks-twitters-bid-to-reveal-government-requests-for-surveillance?xtor=CS3-20&utm_source=STiPad&utm_medium=share&utm_term=2020-04-19 6%3A04%3A33 that freedom. they have to fight for their freedom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
socrates469bc Posted April 20, 2020 Share Posted April 20, 2020 alrdy got academics, legal and human rite activists warning abt pofma being too encompassing and can stifled free speech. the masses got what they want since they think pgd sex is more important than free speech. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now