Forums

.

My republic dun even have real mobile. 

美国陆军将对一名前军医执行枪决，并首次直播执行过程。   https://zb.sg/kMEf   Here is the full detailed report in English:       US Military to Livestream Firing Squad Execution of Nidal Hasan — First-Ever Broadcast   Source: Reuters / AsiaOne • Published: 9 Oct 2026 • URL: https://zb.sg/kMEf       1. Who — The Convict & Crime   - Nidal Malik Hasan, 56, former U.S. Army psychiatrist/major  - On 5 Nov 2009 at Fort Hood, Texas, he opened fire, killing 13 people and wounding 32 others  - He was scheduled to deploy to Afghanistan shortly after the attack  - Convicted Aug 2013 on 45 counts of intentional murder and attempted murder; military jury sentenced him to death  - Shot during his arrest → partially paralysed and uses a wheelchair since    2. When & Where — Execution Details   - Date & time: 3 December 2026, 1:00 PM CST — deliberately matching the approximate time his attack occurred  - Location: Fort Hood, Texas — the same base where the shootings took place  - Method: Firing squad — first U.S. military execution by firing squad since 1945 (WWII era)  - Legal approval: Required presidential assent under U.S. military law; President Donald Trump approved on 2 Oct 2026, following recommendation from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth    3. Unprecedented — The Livestream   - For the first time ever, the execution will be livestreamed for public viewing  - Pentagon confirmed 8 Oct 2026; full broadcast logistics/details to be announced later  - Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth:   "We'll make sure that people are able to watch it, that it's public — because people need to understand that there are serious consequences for these types of things."    - No other country is known to legally broadcast executions; globally, public executions are extremely rare (documented in Iran and Taliban-era Afghanistan)  - Last legally authorised public execution in the U.S.: 1936 (Rainey Bethea, hanging)  - Last U.S. military execution overall: 13 April 1961 (John Bennett, by hanging) — over 65 years ago  - Past media attempts to broadcast executions were blocked by courts    4. Timing & Broader Context   - Announcement follows high-profile botched lethal injection in Tennessee where a prisoner survived two doses, reigniting U.S. capital punishment debate  - Hasan's appellate process has concluded, upholding conviction and sentence         

S'porean man sues woman he dated for over S$100,000, claims she cheated on her with man she eventually married - Mothership.SG - News from Singapore, Asia and around the world   https://mothership.sg/2026/10/singaporean-man-sues-malaysian-ex-girlfriend-benefits/   Here's the full detailed report from the article:       S'porean Man Sues Malaysian Ex-Girlfriend for Over S$100,000   Source: Mothership • Published: 8 Oct 2026, 6:40 PM • By: Xueting Wu       1. Parties & Background   - Claimant: Low (Singaporean) - Defendant: Goh (Malaysian) - Met: 2008 — both worked at the Singapore branch of the same company - Relationship timeline: Low says they became a committed couple by late 2009; they dated until approx 2015 - Break-up: Low discovered Goh was involved with another man — whom she eventually married   2. What Low Claimed & Sought   He is seeking recovery of:   - Over S$100,000 + RM21,600 (~S$6,800) - Breakdown of funds given: - Insurance premiums, personal expenses - Business venture funding - S$31,510 specifically for what he says was to be their matrimonial home in Malaysia — he claims this was held on trust - Jewellery set bought as an engagement gift, after they discussed marriage & children - Access to a Malaysian savings account from which she made withdrawals   Low's argument:   - He spent this money on the belief they were in an exclusive, marriage-bound relationship - He was not a high-income earner and would never have spent this much if he knew it was casual or non-exclusive - She was "falsely leading him on" while seeing another man   Goh's defence:   - Payments were voluntary gifts, not loans or conditional - The relationship was never agreed to be exclusive — that was Low's own assumption - She acknowledges receiving the benefits but denies any obligation to repay   3. First Round: Default Judgment (Sept 2022)   - Lawsuit filed: Feb 2022 - Goh did not respond or participate → court entered default judgment against her - Ordered repayment: S$100,802.99 + RM21,600 + S$2,781.20 costs + interest - Low engaged Malaysian lawyers to enforce; papers served in Johor Bahru — still no response - Low started bankruptcy proceedings in Malaysia → only then did Goh act to challenge the Singapore ruling   4. Goh Challenges the Judgment (April 2026)   - Applied to set aside the default judgment - Claimed she never received the documents because Low was blocked on WhatsApp - Court's finding (Deputy Registrar Lewis Tan): - Lawyers used multiple channels — WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram — not just one - She was aware but chose to ignore until enforcement threatened - Timeline inconsistency: Goh supposedly stopped seeing Low ~2013 after meeting the other man — but payments increased after 2013 - Low's belief in exclusivity appeared reasonable on current evidence - BUT serious issues remained: - Low waited over 8 years from last transfer (Dec 2013) to sue (Feb 2022) - Memories faded; some payments were cash with no records - Other legal avenues existed, weakening his "unjust enrichment" argument   5. Final Outcome — Oct 5 2026   - Deputy Registrar Tan set aside the default judgment entirely - Both parties have substantial cases that need full examination - Case will now proceed to a fresh trial where both sides present evidence       URL: https://mothership.sg/2026/10/singaporean-man-sues-malaysian-ex-girlfriend-benefits/