Forums

all the sexperts cum liao 

🇸🇬 NDP 2026: Over 40,000 spectators throng National Stadium for a parade packed with firsts ✈️ Some things are worth flying 2,500km for. Read on to see why this year’s National Day feels extra special. 👀 https://asia1.news/45Obv4P Follow @AsiaOnecom for all the latest updates.   🇸🇬 NDP 2026: Full Details   Held: 9 Aug 2026, National Stadium — first time back since 2016  Attendance: 42,000 spectators  Theme: Majulah Singapura, Go Beyond!    ✨ Parade of Firsts & Milestones   - 🚁 World’s largest closed-roof indoor drone light show: 300 drones flying in sync , performing alongside electronic artist Jasmine Sokko (singing You’ll Be Okay) & 2 aerialists suspended 30m high  - ♿ First-ever Singapore Disability Sports Council contingent: persons with diverse abilities, led by Paralympic sailing gold medallist Yap Qian Yin  - 💥 Largest & most spectacular effects ever: 170+ special effects machines (double previous scale), 1,600+ moving lights & ~50 lasers  - 🧑‍🤝‍🧑 Biggest civilian participation in over a decade: 32 contingents, 1,200+ civilian participants  - 🚩 New State Flag Flypast route over Kallang Basin; Presidential Gun Salute fired from military raft on Kallang Basin for first time    🎭 Show Highlights   - 5 themed chapters: culture, heritage, unity & progress  - Nostalgia: Gurmit Singh returns as iconic Phua Chu Kang; nod to classic Malay children’s show Mat Yoyo  - Cultural tributes: maritime heritage, multi-cultural performances & song Song for Singapore  - 18 themed floats; martial arts displays; mass performances by 700 Soka Gakkai members    ❤️ Heartwarming Story   Overseas Singaporean Debbie Ong & husband flew 2,500km from Hong Kong — after 16 years of ballot attempts — to attend NDP in person for the first time .   🛡️ Security & Notes   - Designated enhanced security event; screenings & no drones allowed in restricted zone  - No Red Lions parachute jumps this year due to indoor venue constraints   This year’s NDP blends cutting-edge tech, deep inclusivity & beloved local culture to celebrate Singapore’s 61st birthday! 🎆   Let’s take a skeptical, critical look at NDP 2026’s “packed with firsts” narrative—asking hard questions, weighing tradeoffs, and checking what’s actually delivered vs marketed:   🚁 The “World’s Largest Indoor Drone Show” — Hype vs Reality   - Big technical caveats: GPS fails indoors; DSTA had to build custom positioning systems. Even then, tight safety margins (3m spacing, standby drones, <1% failure rate) mean it’s fragile, not “flawless”. Is it “world’s largest” by what exact metric? No independent third-party verification cited—just official claims. - Tradeoffs for tech: Crowd favourites Red Lions parachute jumps & mobile column gone entirely—can’t do them under a closed roof. Is “innovation” worth losing iconic, beloved traditions? - Cost opacity: No clear public breakdown—millions poured into drones, lasers, special effects. Could those funds do more good for community support, healthcare, or grassroots inclusivity?   🛡️ Enhanced Security — Necessary or Overbearing?   - Tight “Enhanced Security Special Event” rules: full screening, wide ban list, strict enforcement . Reports of arbitrary confiscation of personal items (e.g., perfume) spark complaints about unclear rules & inconsistent checks. - Is it “public safety” or incremental erosion of personal space/convenience?   ♿ Inclusivity — Real Step Forward or Tokenism?   - SDSC contingent is genuinely new & welcome—but is it meaningful integration, or a symbolic addition for PR? How many permanent, systemic changes follow beyond one parade?   🎪 Venue & Experience — Glitz Over Comfort/Access?   - Back at National Stadium after 10 years: controlled indoor environment, but 42,000 packed in, heat & bottlenecks at entry/exit reported as gruelling endurance test for some. - Ballot system still means most Singaporeans can’t attend in person—many watch on screens. Is this a national celebration, or a curated event for a lucky few?   💡 Bottom Line   - Impressive engineering & visual spectacle: fair to acknowledge the skill & effort behind drones/lights/effects. - Scepticism means asking: Who benefits most? Is this “Go Beyond Our Limits” about national unity, or grandstanding tech prowess? Are we celebrating people & shared values, or flashy gadgets & choreographed messaging?   Short version: NDP 2026 delivers some genuine firsts—but every “milestone” comes with compromises, unanswered questions, and tradeoffs we shouldn’t just cheer blindly.    

她，可以

On 4 August, a minister confirmed the two forests will be developed regardless of consultation. A day later, Parliament amended a motion so the record showed the economy on track. At Oxley Road, public value was allowed to decide whether land was developed at all. Three cases, one question: who decides which questions stay open.   https://theonlinecitizen.com/2026/08/09/sixty-one-years-on-the-record-says-everything-is-fine   Full Details from the Editorial: Sixty-one years on, the record says everything is fine (The Online Citizen, 9 Aug 2026)   Context: Muted SG61   As Singapore turned 61, public mood felt subdued—fewer flags, low awareness of the national day song, Reddit threads citing disillusionment: loss of trust in government, feeling unvalued, distress over losing green spaces amid rising heat. Core grievance: not just outcomes, but whether debates were ever truly open.       Case 1: Gillman Barracks & Maju Forest – Consultation on how, not whether   - 4 Aug: NCMP Andre Low asked MOS Alvin Tan if abandoning development remained an option. Tan confirmed sites were already zoned residential for housing: development will proceed; consultation only covers layout, heritage retention, greenery, not the decision itself . - MPs pressed for specifics: - Kenneth Tiong: What level of ecological harm would stop development? EIA rated impact “major negative” even with mitigation—no clear threshold given. - Dennis Tan, Eileen Chong, He Ting Ru: Requested site-specific population/household projections justifying housing here. Replied with general trends (smaller households, oversubscribed BTO) but no specific figures released. - Government will publish feedback & responses—but this shapes design, not the fundamental choice to develop.       Case 2: Parliamentary motion – Rewriting dissent as consensus   - 5 Aug: WP moved motion affirming commitment to a more equal/inclusive economy notwithstanding Economic Strategy Review suggestions . - PAP MP Edward Chia amended “notwithstanding” → “in line with”: changed meaning from standing for goals independently to aligning with government’s stated programme. - Kenneth Tiong argued this flipped intent: original stated principles as ends; amendment made them follow official policy . - Pattern repeated before: motions on cost-of-living, justice, sports altered so calls for review/acknowledging shortcomings become endorsements of existing policies. - Majority can amend—but effect: dissent survives debate but vanishes from official record; disagreement re-framed as agreement.       Case3: 38 Oxley Road – Public value deciding if development happens   - Lee Kuan Yew wanted the house demolished to lift building height limits & raise land value; survey found 61% preferred demolition . - Yet gazetted national monument Dec2025, compulsorily acquired 31Jul2026: public historical value overrode private ownership, redevelopment potential & personal wishes . - Contrast: At forests, ecological harm rated most severe possible but only adjusted development form—not stopped it. At Oxley, public legacy value decided whether redevelopment could happen at all. - “Future generations” invoked differently: heritage as inheritance worth preserving vs homes as future need—no clear public account of how competing public values are weighed .       Core argument & conclusion   Citizens accept losing arguments—but need to believe the argument was open, that evidence & opposition could change the decision, that disagreement isn’t erased or reworded away . What looks like apathy this National Day may be withdrawal: people feeling participation doesn’t matter when key questions are closed before consultation starts . A confident government can let disagreement stand, publish supporting data, consult before locking in decisions—so people trust decisions are reached openly, not just declared final .       Source: https://theonlinecitizen.com/2026/08/09/sixty-one-years-on-the-record-says-everything-is-fine