Forums

slow dance    https://www.facebook.com/reel/1572847630468246  

Stompter Dee is dua kumgong kia 

Pawnbroker Maxi-Cash has responded to a customer’s allegations that a preloved Rolex watch he had purchased was “fake”, stating that he had no official “written assessment” to prove his claims. Stomper Dee had purchased a Rolex timepiece from Maxi-Cash in December 2025 during its road show at Lot One shopping mall. The watch was intended to be a gift for his son – now 15 years old – when he turns 21. When asked why he did not purchase the watch from an official Rolex store, Dee said he happened to be shopping in Lot One and decided to get the gift. He added: “Maxi-Cash is such a big company, so we trusted them and didn’t doubt the watch at all.” Months later, on March 10, Dee sent the watch for servicing at Rolex Service Centre. He did so as he would only be giving the timepiece to his son years later. According to Dee, he was informed by an employee at the centre that the serial number on the timepiece was “not inside their system”. “I was extremely shocked and felt embarrassed,” recounted Dee, who visited a Maxi-Cash outlet on the same day to ask for a refund. “Maxi-Cash kept wanting me to hand them my watch (for them to verify), which I chose not to do as I don’t trust them anymore.” According to Dee, the pawnbroker had suggested that the watch may have been modified with inauthentic parts. The Stomper felt that this did not explain why the serial number could not be found in Rolex’s official records. When asked about service recovery, Dee said that Maxi-Cash had offered a refund to his credit card, which he rejected. Maxi-Cash then offered a full cash refund of $35,800 for the transaction and an additional $500 voucher that Dee could use with no minimum spend. Dee said he had requested for a one-for-one exchange of the same timepiece, with the condition that the new piece from Maxi-Cash must have “Rolex-certified authentication”. The pawnbroker ultimately rejected Dee’s proposal. Dee said he found the offer of a full refund with the $500 voucher “insulting”, as his money would have easily “gone to (the) drain” if he had not taken the watch for servicing. After reading this.... moi wonder is fake or real the watch?

A screen fell off another Samsung television set, and this time, it was caught on video. Stomper CT shared CCTV footage of the entire front panel detaching from the rest of the TV before tipping over in her living room on March 17 at around 4.30am. A cat behind a sofa at the side of the room was startled and ran off. This is the third time a Stomper has reported the screen falling off their Samsung TV in less than six months. One incident was reported in November 2025 and the other in February 2026, both of which prompted CT to share her own experience with Stomp. CT had bought her Samsung 65-inch TV for $2,499 in 2019. It came with a three-year warranty. She was shocked when she discovered the screen had fallen off. “It happened just before I came down to prepare my pre-dawn meals for the family,” recounted CT. “I’m so glad none of my cats were nearby.” But it was still “quite concerning”, she said, even though the TV is no longer under warranty. “I mean, yes, electronic items will have a limit on how long they will last. But a screen suddenly coming off is not something anyone wants to experience, especially those who have small kids or, in my case, pets,” explained the Stomper. “It’s not like anyone came and knocked on the screen to trigger anything.” In response to a Stomp query, a spokesperson for Samsung said on March 31: “We have been in active contact with the customer to provide support for the incident. The issue has been since resolved.” CT said that after Stomp contacted Samsung, someone was sent to collect her TV. She was told that her TV would be repaired and returned to her at no charge. *Moi de tablet using as a google assistant the panel also came off after 2 years the adhesive really got problem

Prefer to came in them