Brighton sharp shooting and full of attacking verve.    Tottenham is pretty much cursed at this point.    Coventry getting their first premier league win in 25 years and their 100th win. 

D, e, f, g 4-6. I do area bombardment. 

Chinese man sues AI firm after chatbot’s ‘auspicious’ date suggestion leads to disaster   https://www.scmp.com/news/people-culture/trending-china/article/3368136/chinese-man-sues-ai-firm-after-chatbots-auspicious-date-suggestion-leads-disaster?utm_source=rss_feed   Here's the full detailed account from the South China Morning Post report (published 20 Sep 2026):       Full Case Details   Parties & Background   - Plaintiff: Mr. Shi, from Jiashan County, Zhejiang Province — youngest of five siblings - Defendant: Beijing Chuntian Zhiyun Technology, operator of the AI chatbot - Incident timeline: April 2026 — Mr. Shi's mother died suddenly from illness   The Sequence of Events   1. Initial plan: Family consulted a feng shui master, selected April 20 as burial date 2. Concern arises: Shi worried April 20 fell on the 4th day after death — local custom considers even-numbered days unlucky for burials 3. AI consultation: He turned to the chatbot, which recommended April 19, plus advised burning paper horses & paper money before the procession 4. Contradiction emerges: Chatbot also stated April 19 was not an auspicious date, yet simultaneously suggested burial time 7am–9am that same day 5. Decision made: Shi had already notified relatives; date could not be changed 6. Aftermath: Shortly after the funeral, a family relative suffered serious injuries in a traffic accident (exact timing undisclosed) 7. Family reaction: Relatives blamed the burial date, claiming it disrupted feng shui and brought bad luck   The Lawsuit   - Claims: AI gave misleading advice → caused family rift & misfortune; seeks apology + compensation (amount undisclosed) - Notable twist: Shi used the same AI chatbot to draft the lawsuit & outline legal procedures - Company's defence: - Terms of use state AI content is for reference only, not professional advice - User agreement accepted by using the service; no online infringement occurred - Shi's counter-arguments: - User agreement unfairly shifts responsibility to users - Insufficient warnings provided - AI lacked proper review of information sources   Current Status   - Case heard at local court; still ongoing   Public Reaction Online   - "AI is only a tool. It is unfortunate for those who cannot evaluate its answers independently." - "The irony is that this man is using AI to sue the AI company."       Source: South China Morning Post / Jimu News reporting | Published: 10:21am, 20 Sep 2026

RIP, tough physical work to do deliveries

Danke   funny i see noobmaster in my list for signature