does this blood clot study sample even made sense????

[socrates469bc]

tokong scientists tell me that wuhan causes more blood clots than astrazeneca vaccine but if a person doesnt even get wuhan in the first place, how he/she can possibly get blood clot from wuhan?????

 

Brain clots 'more likely' with Covid infection than vaccine

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/health-56760163

 

the issue is whether a vaccine can cause blood clotting in the brain and not whether wuhan infection will result in more brain clots.

 

if a person exercises all the necessary precautions, how can he/she get wuhan in the first place?????

 

in statistical lingo, this research has committed sampling error and type 1 error.

 

firstly, the correct sampling sample to be studied in this case r on the recipients of the different vaccines and not on the unvaccinated since the objective is to determine whether a vaccine is more prone to blood clotting compared to other vaccines.

 

secondly, a type 1 error has been committed by virtue of using the wrong sampling, ie assuming that wuhan causes more cases of clotting than the vaccinated group.

 

in layman's term, this study is comparing apples vs oranges.

 

really think whole world bo study statistics.

 

 

[The_King]

same like eating noodles is healther then eating flour

[Cynical Ape]

Lol wrong forum to share this cheem phd level stuff.  Shld put this in NK forum, maybe the geniuses there can help you dissect this. 

Edited April 16, 2021 by Cynical Ape