It is possible he sell those bookings to let others use he has made?

This one is sabo leh. Yes he is your spouse but you cannot push him to die mah

A resident at a Choa Chu Kang HDB block has allegedly been repeatedly urinating in the level two lift area despite having a toilet in his flat.   Chua Chu Kang Town Council told MS News that they were notified of the case and “have stepped up cleaning efforts to keep the affected common area clean”.   👉 https://tsl.to/hdbblockurinating   @mustsharenews   Here's the full detailed account of the incident:       Full Details — Choa Chu Kang HDB Public Urination Incident   📅 Timeline & Source   - Posted: Thursday, 17 Sep 2026, on Facebook page Complaint Singapore - Latest alleged incident: 16 Sep 2026, ~7:40 PM - Reported by: MS News / MustShareNews, 24 Sep 2026   📍 Location   - Block 813A Choa Chu Kang Avenue 7 — Level 2, common area directly outside the lift   🧑 Alleged Behaviour   - A male resident living in the block repeatedly urinates in the lift lobby on Level 2, despite having a functioning toilet inside his own flat - The OP stated he "refuses to use" his home toilet and instead treats the public corridor as his personal restroom - Phrasing "it happened again" indicates this is not a one-off but ongoing behaviour - The matter has not been independently verified by news outlets - It was initially unclear whether authorities had been formally notified   💬 Netizen Reactions   - Suggestions included installing dummy/fake CCTV cameras as a deterrent - Lighthearted speculation: some joked he might be "saving on water bills" or avoiding cleaning his own toilet - Others noted similar issues occurring elsewhere in Singapore   🏛️ Town Council Response (Chua Chu Kang Town Council)   Confirmed notification of the case and taken action:   - ✅ Stepped up cleaning of the affected area - ✅ Posted prominent warning notices at the spot and surrounding areas - ⚖️ Fines stated on notice: - First offence: up to S$1,000 - Repeat offenders: up to S$5,000 - Ongoing monitoring and coordination with relevant enforcement agencies   ⚖️ Legal Context   - Public urination is an offence under the Environmental Public Health (Public Cleansing) Regulations - Typical penalties: $1,000 max (1st), $2,000 (2nd), $5,000 (3rd & subsequent) - Enforcement is handled by NEA unless criminal elements are involved       🔗 Source: https://tsl.to/hdbblockurinating @mustsharenews    

sometimes being the solo one/chosen one for any scenarios can be a disaster... 

An SAF regular who agreed to help a woman incorporate a company in Singapore ended up in jail after the firm, opened under his name, was linked to over $372,000 in scam proceeds.   https://str.sg/NpmQ   Here's the full detailed account from the report:       Full Case Details   Who & When   - Accused: N. M. Pranesh, 25, a Singapore Armed Forces regular  - Sentenced: 11 months' jail on 24 September 2026  - Sentence start: Expected 1 October 2026  - Bail: Set at S$20,000  - Also: Disqualified from being a company director or taking part in firm management for 5 years from release    The Scheme & How It Started   - January 2022: A woman known only as "Judy" contacted Pranesh via Telegram with a Malaysian phone number  - She promised S$10,000 over two months to help set up a company purportedly to sell watches from China  - She asked for his Singpass login details, which he shared with an unknown man on her instructions  - She directed him to Tricia Lam, a corporate service provider representative  - 24 Feb 2022: In a video call, Lam asked him to hold up his NRIC; Pranesh followed a script from "Judy", lied that the company was for his own use, and concealed Judy's involvement  - He paid S$650 from his own pocket for incorporation fees  - 25 Feb 2022: Prodigym Trading was incorporated — Pranesh became its sole director and shareholder    The Scam Funds   - 14–16 March 2022: US$274,945 (S$372,110) transferred into Prodigym's bank account  - Money came from a love scam victim based in Germany and her company  - Large sums were withdrawn shortly after deposits  - Pranesh tried contacting Judy but she vanished from Telegram by 16 March  - April 2022: Bank closed Prodigym's account; company struck off in 2023    Investigation & Legal Proceedings   - 4 July 2022: German victim reported to police  - 16 July 2025: Pranesh arrested  - Charges: Pleaded guilty to being involved in an arrangement linked to benefits of criminal conduct, plus failing to exercise supervision over the company  - Prosecution (DPP Bryan Wong): Pranesh knew Judy and associates were up to something illegal  - Defence: He was not the mastermind, received no payment, and didn't know the full scale of offences        Key Takeaways   - This is a classic "mule director" case — people recruited to front companies used to channel illicit funds  - Even if promised payment never arrives, allowing your name to be used and signing documents falsely carries serious criminal penalties  - Never share Singpass, never incorporate companies for others for money, and always verify who you're dealing with — especially online contacts offering easy cash