Jump to content
  • Sign Up Now!

     

    • Join in discussions about all the latest innovations in mobile phones, gadgets, computer, hardware, software and latest games.

     

     

  • Upcoming Events

    No upcoming events found
  • Chatbox

    Load More
    You don't have permission to chat.
  • Posts

    • just click refresh of browser. eventually it will load  
    • Singapore’s Beverage Container Return Scheme (BCRS) is set to enter full implementation on 1 Oct, but one netizen has questioned whether the scheme could have unintended effects on small and parallel beverage importers and competition.   👉 https://tsl.to/bcrsschemeparallelimporters   @mustsharenews  Here's the full detailed breakdown from the article and related sources 👇       📋 Singapore Beverage Container Return Scheme (BCRS) — Full Details   ⏰ Timeline   - Launched: 1 April 2026 (transition period: 1 Apr – 30 Sep 2026)  - Full implementation: 1 October 2026 — only beverages with the Deposit Mark may be supplied  - Licence period: 1 Apr 2026 – 31 Mar 2033    ♻️ What the Scheme Covers   - Pre-packaged beverages in plastic & metal containers, 150ml – 3L  - 10¢ deposit added at purchase → refunded when container returned intact  - Excluded: glass, cartons/pouches, <150ml / >3L, freshly prepared drinks  - Return via >1,000 Reverse Vending Machines (RVMs) islandwide    🏢 Operator & Governance   - BCRS Ltd — not-for-profit, licensed by NEA  - Founded by Coca-Cola Singapore, F&N Foods, Pokka  - CCCS assessed Jan 2025: joint operation unlikely to breach Competition Act  - CCCS had previously advised NEA to review costs, targets & competition safeguards    💰 Compliance Costs — All Producers / Importers   Item Cost  One-time registration fee S$500 (waived if registered before 9 Aug 2025)[__LINK_ICON]  Per-product registration S$5 per SKU[__LINK_ICON]  Producer fee (per unit) 3.1¢ (metal) / 3.7¢ (plastic)[__LINK_ICON]  Deposit per unit 10¢ (refundable)[__LINK_ICON]  Stickers (if packaging can't be updated) 4–18¢ each, volume-dependent  International barcode security fee Additional refundable fee if not using SG-specific barcode[__LINK_ICON]    ⚠️ Netizen's Concerns (posted 20 Sep 2026)   1. Disproportionate Impact on Small Importers   - Large producers spread redesign costs over millions of units → pennies per item - Small/niche importers bring in thousands → fixed & per-unit costs hit far harder - Quote: "5 cents per unit may be trivial at 10 million units and significant at 10,000"  - Overseas manufacturers rarely adjust packaging for Singapore → importers must buy & apply stickers manually   2. Parallel Imports & Consumer Choice at Risk   - Parallel imports often priced ~70¢ vs ~S$1 for mainstream alternatives  - Compliance costs could erase that price gap  - Niche/low-volume products may become unviable → quietly disappear from shelves  - No formal ban — just economic unfeasibility → fewer choices    3. Who Runs the Scheme?   - BCRS Ltd owned by 3 major local producers → OP questions fairness for smaller players  - CCCS flagged risks: info sharing, competition safeguards needed    4. Proposed Success Metrics — Beyond Container Counts   - OP says collections alone ≠ success  - Should also measure: - Net recycling gain (not just shifted) - Financial & carbon cost of running scheme - Impact on prices & household budgets - Number of importers/SKUs exiting market - Long-term trade attractiveness of Singapore  - Suggestion: simplified/lighter-touch rules for very small-volume importers    📊 Scheme Progress So Far (as of 13 Sep 2026)   - 33+ million containers collected  - 553 tonnes processed at Tuas facility  - Targets: 60% return rate Y1 → 80% by 2029    📅 Government Response   - Minister Grace Fu (8 Sep 2026): NEA will review financials & effectiveness after Year 1  - Transition grant up to S$2,500 available — but importers say insufficient - No permanent exemptions announced; full implementation proceeds 1 Oct        The core tension: environmental goals vs Singapore's identity as an easy, low-friction trading hub — where fixed compliance costs hurt most because total market size is small .      
    • Progress Singapore Party chief Leong Mun Wai spent last Saturday morning speaking to Singaporeans at a hawker centre about the increase in ministerial salaries.   Mr Leong argued that a fairer political environment would attract talent into politics regardless of lower pay.   👉 https://tsl.to/leongmunwaisalaries   @mustsharenews   Here's the full detailed account:       📋 Leong Mun Wai on Ministerial Salary Hikes — Full Details   📢 The Salary Increase (Announced 8 Sep)   - Ministerial pay: Up to 9% one-off adjustment effective 15 Oct 2026 — first update in 15 years  - MP allowance: From S$13,750 → S$18,500/month (+S$4,750)  - MR4 benchmark: Raised from S$1.1M → S$1.8M/year; sitting ministers get max 9% now (~S$1.2M), not full jump  - PM Lawrence Wong's stance: Higher pay needed to attract talent; he will donate his own raise for next 5 years    🗣️ Leong Mun Wai's Hawker Centre Engagement (19 Sep)   - Where: Mayflower Market & Food Centre, Ang Mo Kio - Who: PSP chief Leong Mun Wai with party members - Public sentiment: Many diners expressed unease — hikes come amid uncertain economy & financial pressures on ordinary Singaporeans    ⚖️ Conflict of Interest Question from a Young Couple   - Question: Is there a conflict when Parliament votes to set its own pay? - Leong's explanation: Parliament does hold constitutional authority; an independent review committee did recommend the changes. - His concern: With one party holding overwhelming majority, how to guarantee checks, transparency & public trust in such decisions?    💬 PSP's Position on Talent & Pay   - Leong agrees leaders deserve fair compensation - Disagrees that high pay is the key to attracting talent: "There will be no shortage of capable Singaporeans willing to serve for less."  - Better approach: A fairer, more open political system — purpose & desire to serve, not salary, will draw the best talent    🔗 Source   - Reported: 22 Sep 2026 - Link: https://tsl.to/leongmunwaisalaries        
    • Man, 72, found dead at Ang Mo Kio home after black blood seen seeping through his door   The deceased lived alone in the flat.    😔 https://stmp.sg/dakA   @stompteam Here's the full detailed account:       📋 72-Year-Old Man Found Dead in Ang Mo Kio Home — Full Details   📌 Incident Overview   - Victim: 72-year-old male - Location: 2nd-floor unit, Block 530 Ang Mo Kio Avenue 10 - Alerted: ~1.10pm, Sept 21, 2026 — police & SCDF called - Status: Pronounced dead at the scene - Source: STOMP / Shin Min Daily News, published 23 Sep 2026   🔍 Discovery Sequence   - Last seen: Around Sept 17 by a neighbour's mother - Unusual sign: Usually kept lights & TV on; noticed lights off from Friday night — something felt amiss - Sept 21 (noon): Neighbour detected pungent odour; his mother saw black blood seeping from under the door → police called   🏠 Background   - Lived alone for ~5 years after family moved out - Rarely opened doors/windows; reclusive - Reported long-term mental health struggles; social workers visited regularly - Downstairs drinks stall manager saw him last week trying to buy a drink before the shop opened - Staff accommodation in the same unit block had recently been painted — may explain why smell went unnoticed earlier   🚔 Police Findings   - Classified as unnatural death - No foul play suspected — preliminary investigations - Investigations are ongoing   🔗 Link   https://stmp.sg/dakA          
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Mugentech.net uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By using this site you agree to Privacy Policy