This video explains the Halo Effect, a psychological bias where a single trait—often physical attractiveness—influences our overall judgment of a person's character, intelligence, or competence (0:00-0:12).   Key takeaways from the video:   Definition & Origins: The bias means we often incorrectly assume beautiful people are kinder, smarter, or more reliable. This concept was first researched by Edward Thorndike in 1920, who observed that officers tended to rate taller, more attractive soldiers as having better leadership skills and character (0:49-1:10).   Real-World Impact: Education: Teachers may unconsciously give higher grades to well-behaved or attractive students (1:28-1:36).   Workplace: Supervisors might rate employees as high-performing based on one positive trait, such as dedication, while ignoring actual mistakes (2:20-2:44).   Marketing & Branding: Brands use the Halo Effect by hiring celebrities for endorsements; consumers transfer their positive feelings about the celebrity to the product itself (3:12-3:36, 3:58-4:08).   How to Counteract It: Since this bias often happens unconsciously, the speaker suggests we should strive to be objective, give people time to reveal their true selves, and research products (like reading reviews) rather than relying solely on first impressions or appearances (4:09-4:48).    

If u see how scary constance looks like now after latest plastic surgery, the IO no issue

Beyond the primary set of phrases, gaslighters frequently rely on additional verbal tactics to shift blame, dodge accountability, and dismantle your trust in your own perception:    * "I was only trying to help you."    * Intent: Frames invasive control, harsh criticism, or unsolicited advice as an act of kindness, making you feel ungrateful if you object.    * "You have a terrible memory."    * Intent: Directly targets your confidence in your cognitive abilities so you rely on their version of events rather than your own recall.    * "You're misremembering things again."    * Intent: Softens the denial of a boundary breach by suggesting your recall is consistently flawed or untrustworthy.    * "I don't know why you're bringing up the past."    * Intent: Shutters discussions about established behavioral patterns or unfulfilled promises, framing your effort to address ongoing issues as unfair or dwelling.    * "You're twisting my words."    * Intent: Flips the narrative when called out on a specific statement, accusing you of malice or misinterpretation instead of taking ownership.    * "I guess I'm just the bad guy then."    * Intent: Uses extreme self-deprecation to force you into comforting them or backing down from a valid critique.    * "You're overthinking this."    * Intent: Dismisses analytical thinking or legitimate concern as irrational fixation, encouraging you to ignore red flags.    * "I never said that... you must have dreamed it."    * Intent: Introduces absurd alternative explanations for real conversations to make you question your basic sanity.    * "Why are you making such a big deal out of nothing?"    * Intent: Trivializes serious breaches of trust (like financial secrecy or lying) to make your reaction appear unreasonable.    * "If you didn't act like that, I wouldn't have reacted this way."    * Intent: Outsources full responsibility for their anger, outbursts, or poor behavior directl y onto your actions.

Sic link 

This guy is a murderer.   Harvest some young kidneys, liver, bone marrow, heart, cornea...   The rest will grind for tiger feeding in the zoos.