Beyond the primary set of phrases, gaslighters frequently rely on additional verbal tactics to shift blame, dodge accountability, and dismantle your trust in your own perception:    * "I was only trying to help you."    * Intent: Frames invasive control, harsh criticism, or unsolicited advice as an act of kindness, making you feel ungrateful if you object.    * "You have a terrible memory."    * Intent: Directly targets your confidence in your cognitive abilities so you rely on their version of events rather than your own recall.    * "You're misremembering things again."    * Intent: Softens the denial of a boundary breach by suggesting your recall is consistently flawed or untrustworthy.    * "I don't know why you're bringing up the past."    * Intent: Shutters discussions about established behavioral patterns or unfulfilled promises, framing your effort to address ongoing issues as unfair or dwelling.    * "You're twisting my words."    * Intent: Flips the narrative when called out on a specific statement, accusing you of malice or misinterpretation instead of taking ownership.    * "I guess I'm just the bad guy then."    * Intent: Uses extreme self-deprecation to force you into comforting them or backing down from a valid critique.    * "You're overthinking this."    * Intent: Dismisses analytical thinking or legitimate concern as irrational fixation, encouraging you to ignore red flags.    * "I never said that... you must have dreamed it."    * Intent: Introduces absurd alternative explanations for real conversations to make you question your basic sanity.    * "Why are you making such a big deal out of nothing?"    * Intent: Trivializes serious breaches of trust (like financial secrecy or lying) to make your reaction appear unreasonable.    * "If you didn't act like that, I wouldn't have reacted this way."    * Intent: Outsources full responsibility for their anger, outbursts, or poor behavior directl y onto your actions.

Sic link 

This guy is a murderer.   Harvest some young kidneys, liver, bone marrow, heart, cornea...   The rest will grind for tiger feeding in the zoos.

171 Sungai Kim Kim victims win civil suit against factory and two Singaporean directors seven years after toxic waste disaster: Seven years after the Sungai Kim Kim disaster, 171 victims have secured a civil court victory against four defendants, including two Singaporean nationals. The amount of damages will be decided later.   🔗 Read more: https://theindependent.sg/171-sungai-kim-kim-victims-win-civil-suit-against-factory-and-two-singaporean-directors-seven-years-after-toxic-waste-disaster/   On September 9, 2026, the Johor Bahru High Court ruled in favor of 171 plaintiffs affected by the 2019 Sungai Kim Kim chemical pollution disaster in Pasir Gudang, Malaysia. Key Details of the Judgment    * Liable Defendants:      * P Tech Resources Sdn Bhd (a used tire processing factory).      * Wang Jing Chao (41) & Yap Yoke Liang (43) — Singaporean directors of the factory.      * N. Maridass (42) — Lorry driver responsible for dumping the hazardous waste.      * Legal Costs: The four defendants were ordered to pay RM100,000 (~S$31,200) in legal costs to the plaintiffs.    * Dismissed Claims:      * The High Court dismissed claims against 8 state and local authority defendants, including the Johor state government, former Menteri Besar (the late Datuk Osman Sapian), former state Health and Environment Committee chairman Datuk Sahruddin Jamal, the Johor Environment Department, and the Pasir Gudang Municipal Council.      * These 8 defendants were awarded RM80,000 in legal costs. Damages Assessment Phase The current ruling addresses liability only. The court will schedule a case management date to assess the financial damages to be awarded:    * Students & Public (42 plaintiffs): Seeking RM30 million in general and special damages.    * Fishermen (129 plaintiffs): Claiming RM3 million for economic losses caused by river pollution.   Trial Overview & Background    * Trial Length: The trial ran for 20 days (having commenced in 2022), featuring testimony from 19 plaintiff witnesses and 12 defense witnesses.    * The 2019 Disaster: Toxic industrial waste was illegally dumped into Sungai Kim Kim in early March 2019. The resulting toxic fumes affected over 2,000 people, hospitalized nearly 1,000, and forced the temporary closure of 111 schools across Pasir Gudang.    * Impact on Victims: Among the plaintiffs is Irfan Wafiy (now 19), who developed myokymia (a neurological muscle twitching condition) following the disaster. While his mobility has improved, he still suffers persistent leg pain.