-
Upcoming Events
No upcoming events found
-
Popular Contributors
-
Posts
-
By CannotTahanLiao · Posted
Sometimes i wish I'm a woman and my career is to shave body hair for women Can openly sniff their armpits when the session is done mmmm -
😨 2 aunties were spotted getting into a physical brawl at a coffeeshop in Serangoon on Jun. 22. They are currently assisting with police investigations. ▶️ https://bit.ly/3QyGm1v Follow us @mothershipsg The physical altercation between two elderly women at a Serangoon coffeeshop went viral across local social media platforms under the moniker **"PMA vs. Walking Stick."** The incident took place at the coffee shop located at **Block 261 Serangoon Central Drive** on Monday evening, **22 June 2026**. ### The Confrontation Timeline The dispute was captured in video footage uploaded to Facebook and Instagram, showing a highly heated escalation between a 65-year-old woman and a 69-year-old woman: * **The Argument:** The altercation began verbally. The woman in her 60s wearing a pink/grey blouse was seated on her Personal Mobility Aid (PMA), recording the encounter on her mobile phone, while shouting "CCTV!" and pointing toward the ceiling at another woman dressed in blue/green. * **The First Strike:** The confrontation turned physical when the woman in blue lifted her **walking stick** and jabbed/shoved it directly into the midsection of the woman on the PMA. * **The Escalation:** Provoked by the strike, the woman on the PMA got off her vehicle, lunged forward, and attempted to snatch the walking stick while simultaneously landing a punch to the other woman's jaw. * **The Tumble:** Due to the physical momentum and struggle over the walking stick, both women lost their balance and crashed heavily onto the tiled floor of the coffeeshop. * **The Ground Brawl:** Even while on the ground, the pair refused to let go, continuously tugging at each other, kicking, and pulling hair. Multiple onlookers and a fellow patron eventually rushed forward to intervene, pulling the two women apart and attempting to calm the situation down. ### Emergency Response and Injuries The Singapore Police Force (SPF) was alerted to the incident at around **7:55 PM**, followed shortly by the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) at **8:25 PM**. * **The 69-year-old woman** was found conscious by paramedics and was conveyed to **Tan Tock Seng Hospital** for medical assessment and treatment. * **The 65-year-old woman** sustained minor injuries at the scene but flatly declined to be taken to the hospital. ### Current Legal Status Both women are currently **assisting the Singapore Police Force with ongoing investigations**. Under Singapore's Penal Code, individuals who engage in physical brawls in public spaces can face charges of **affray** (disturbing the public peace by fighting), which carries a statutory penalty of up to one year in prison, a fine of up to S$5,000, or both.
-
A 23-year-old Chinese national who lost his Singapore permanent resident status after failing to renew his re-entry permit was fined S$9,000 on 25 June 2026 after pleading guilty to offences under the Enlistment Act linked to his failure to register for national service. https://theonlinecitizen.com/2026/06/25/china-born-former-singapore-pr-fined-s-9-000-after-admitting-national-service-default-during-covid-19-period The case of **You Jiahao**, the 23-year-old Chinese national who defaulted on his National Service (NS) obligations, offers a clear look at how strictly Singapore enforces the Enlistment Act, even when a defaulter's permanent residency (PR) is revoked by the state. Here is the comprehensive breakdown of the court proceedings, the timeline of his default, and his defense arguments. ### Key Facts & Timeline You Jiahao obtained his Singapore PR status in **January 2014** when he was 11 years old. He lived in Singapore and attended Outram Secondary School up until Secondary 4. * **March 2016 (Age 13):** An exit permit information letter was sent to his registered address, warning that he would be subject to exit permit regulations under the Enlistment Act from his 13th birthday. * **August 2020 (Age 17):** At the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, You left Singapore for China. * **April 2021 (Age 18):** An NS registration notice was officially sent to his address, directing him to log into the NS portal and complete his pre-enlistment registration by May 31, 2021. You did not do so. * **August 2021:** Having left the country without an exit permit and ignoring the notice, a **police gazette** was officially raised against him. * **July 2022 (Age 19):** You emailed the Central Manpower Base (CMPB) asking for assistance to *renew his re-entry permit*. In the email, he acknowledged his duty to serve NS but asked if it could be postponed until after he completed his university studies in China. * **July 26, 2022:** CMPB responded, explicitly telling him that he had committed offenses under the Enlistment Act and ordering him to return to Singapore immediately. * **August 1, 2022:** Because he had failed to renew his re-entry permit from abroad, the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority (ICA) **revoked his PR status**. * **March 27, 2025:** After nearly three years away, You returned to Singapore and was immediately **arrested at Changi Airport**. In total, he remained outside of Singapore without a valid exit permit for exactly **one year, 11 months, and six days**. ### The Charges & Sentencing On June 25, 2026, You Jiahao pleaded guilty to **two charges** under the Enlistment Act for remaining outside Singapore without a valid exit permit. Another two charges regarding his failure to register for NS were taken into consideration during sentencing. * **The Prosecution's Stance:** Deputy Public Prosecutor Vishnu Menon pressed for a fine of at least $9,000. He emphasized that You's default period was only *just* shy of the two-year mark—the threshold where courts routinely start handing out mandatory custodial (jail) sentences. The prosecution pointed out that the only reason You's default didn't stretch longer was because ICA cut his PR status, legally freeing him from the Enlistment Act. * **The "Unfair Advantage" Argument:** The prosecution reiterated a fundamental tenant of Singapore's defense policy: NS defaulters gain an unfair advantage over their law-abiding peers by getting to freely pursue personal accolades, higher education, or career goals while local males are forced to put their lives on hold to serve. ### The Defense & Mitigation You, who was unrepresented by a lawyer in court, spoke through an interpreter to express regret, claiming his default was an act of ignorance rather than malicious evasion: 1. **COVID-19 Disruption:** He claimed that he had to return to China during the pandemic and faced disruptions making it difficult to return. 2. **Ignorance of the Law:** He stated he was genuinely unfamiliar with the nuances of the Enlistment Act, assuming he was legally allowed to finish his university degree in China first before returning to serve. 3. **No Intent to Evade:** He told the court: *"It was not my intention to evade my NS obligations... Whatever it is, I have realised my mistake and I have returned to Singapore to deal with this matter."* ### Why Only a Fine? Under the Enlistment Act, remaining outside Singapore without an exit permit carries a maximum penalty of up to three years in jail, a fine of up to $10,000, or both. Because his duration of default fell just short of 2 years (1 year and 11 months) and he surrendered himself by flying back to Singapore, he avoided jail time. He was fined **S$9,000**, which he paid in full. However, his future ties to Singapore are effectively severed now that his PR status is gone.
-
By ExTreMisTxxx · Posted
OCBC wealth manager pull down and show u her panty kym -
💡 From July 1, self-imported electrical products must meet energy efficient requirements: NEA These measures will affect six regulated goods: air-conditioners, clothes dryers, household water heaters, refrigerators, televisions and three-phase induction motors. READ: https://asia1.news/4ad7oCg Follow @AsiaOnecom for all the latest updates. The National Environment Agency (NEA) announced a major regulatory update aimed at closing a loophole in Singapore's green energy laws. Starting **1 July 2026**, individuals and businesses who directly self-import specific electrical appliances for their own use must comply with national energy efficiency regulations. ### The Loophole Being Closed Previously, the **Mandatory Energy Labelling Scheme (MELS)** and **Minimum Energy Performance Standards (MEPS)** only applied to appliances imported by distributors to be *sold* locally in Singapore stores. However, with the massive boom in online global marketplaces and e-commerce platforms, more local households and businesses have been directly self-importing heavy appliances (like refrigerators or water heaters) from overseas. Because these "own-use" imports bypassed local retail checkpoints, many consumers unknowingly imported highly energy-inefficient models, locking themselves into high utility bills and increasing the country's carbon footprint. ### The Six Regulated Goods The new rules apply strictly to six specific categories of high-energy-consuming appliances: 1. Air-conditioners 2. Refrigerators 3. Clothes dryers 4. Televisions 5. Household water heaters 6. Three-phase induction motors (primarily used by commercial businesses) ### Key Requirements from July 1 * **Pre-Import Registration:** Anyone intending to self-import any of the six appliances listed above must register the product on **NEA’s online portal** *before* it arrives in Singapore. * **Approval & Validity:** If approved, NEA will issue a Certificate of Registration (CoR) within **7 working days**. This certificate is valid for **3 years** and is renewable. * **Cost:** To prevent an unfair financial burden on individuals, NEA has **waived all registration and renewal fees** for end-users importing for personal use. * **Banned Advertisements:** E-commerce platforms (like Shopee, Lazada, etc.) will be legally barred from hosting advertisements for non-compliant appliances targeted at Singapore buyers. Any visual advertisement for these items must clearly display the official NEA energy label next to the description. ### Penalties for Violations The government is taking enforcement seriously to prevent a flood of cheap, inefficient appliances. Under the updated framework, penalties will be levied on a **per-import basis**, with fines reaching **up to $10,000** for each instance of importing a non-compliant regulated good for own use. ### Available Subsidies To cushion the transition and encourage eco-friendly buying habits, NEA highlighted existing support mechanisms: * **Households:** Can utilize the ongoing **Climate Vouchers** scheme to offset the cost of buying energy-efficient appliances locally. * **SMEs & Businesses:** Can tap into Enterprise Singapore's **Energy Efficiency Grant (EEG)** to subsidize pre-approved, energy-efficient equipment.
-
