The_King

SINGAPORE: Legal proceedings by clients of the cord blood storage service provider Cordlife have commenced, with the first letter of demand received, the company said on Thursday (May 2). A letter of demand, usually sent by lawyers, contains a list of demands. If the recipient - in this case, Cordlife - does not meet these demands, legal action, such as a lawsuit, may follow. In November last year, it emerged that seven of its 22 storage tanks were exposed to sub-optimal temperatures, affecting the cord blood units of thousands of its clients. So far, investigations have revealed that over 7,000 cord blood units have been damaged. In an announcement on the Singapore Exchange (SGX), Cordlife said the letter of demand was the first it had received from a client. In response to CNA's queries, Cordlife said on Thursday evening that the letter alleges that the company was negligent and had breached its obligations under the service agreement, in relation to the storage of the client's cord blood unit. 07:45 Min Cordlife's former Group CEO, Tan Poh Lan, has been arrested for potential breaches of the company's disclosure obligations. The private blood bank is under investigation for mishandling cord blood units last year.…see more Cordlife said the sum the client is claiming falls within the jurisdiction of the district courts, which deal with claims between S$60,000 and S$250,000. After seeking legal advice, Cordlife said it does not agree with the client's contention that the company is precluded from relying on various clauses of the client’s contract. It intends to defend the claim and said the client's lawyers have not provided any supporting details so far. The letter was received earlier this week and is the only lawyer's letter of demand the company has received, it added. Cordlife also said on Thursday, that in February, it had received notice of a claim lodged against it in the Small Claims Tribunal (SCT) by another client. The claim alleged that the damage to the client's child's cord blood unit was a result of Cordlife's storage of the unit. The claim amount was not stated. Matters dealt with by the Small Claims Tribunal have a claim limit of S$20,000 and lawyers are not allowed to represent parties. In the SGX filing, the company said it was unable to determine the exact financial impact of the claim in the letter of the demand. "Should the Company be ultimately required to settle the claim in the Letter of Demand, the SCT Claim and/or claims made by multiple clients, this will likely result in a negative impact on the financial position of the Group for the financial year ending Dec 31, 2024," said Cordlife. So far, seven directors or former directors have been arrested in connection Cordlife's alleged mishandling of the cord blood, including former Group CEO Tan Poh Lan. On Apr 17, Cordlife's board of directors lodged a police report over the "potential wrongdoings" of former employees. The cord blood bank has offered customers a refund of annual fees "since the start of temperature excursion" and promised to waive subsequent fees until their child turns 21. However, some customers told CNA in April that they were not satisfied with Cordlife's offer, citing that it lacked fairness. Some parents told CNA then that they would not accept Cordlife's refund offer or that they were weighing their options, including legal action. Customers who do accept the refund offer must agree to four clauses - one of them being accepting the offer as a "final settlement". Source: CNA/at(ac)

that why cash is king, confirm many ppl dont have the chemical and mean to counterfeit notes

A 17-year-old teenager fooled various businesses in Singapore, cheating them of more than S$15,000 by renaming his PayNow account to match theirs, and showing them screenshots of the "payments". The dishonest screenshots were used to "pay" for items like Bvlgari jewellery, mobile phones, a puppy, and garlands for bar hostesses. At least four separate police reports were made against the teen, who is now 19 and cannot be named under the Children and Young Persons Act (CYPA). He was arrested in June 2022, after a bar in Lavender had a dispute with him over unpaid bills and called the police. Renamed personal account to fake PayNow transfers One place where the teen used the dishonest PayNow screenshots was at the Bvlgari store in Ion Orchard. Court documents indicated that on Apr. 10, 2022, he picked out a leather wallet and a pink gold ring at the store, which cost S$3,410 in total. The teen then showed the cashier four PayNow screenshots of transfers supposedly made to Bvlgari's UEN account, before leaving the store with the goods. Unbeknownst to the staff there, he had changed the name of his personal PayNow account to match that of the company — essentially paying himself. Caught after mistake noticed in company's name The teen returned to the outlet the next day and tried the same tactic to purchase a S$5,000 necklace. This time, however, a Bvlgari staff noticed a minor mistake in the company's name reflected in the PayNow screenshots. It was missing an "s". While the staff were checking to verify if the payments were successful, the teen left the store without the necklace as he was nervous. Only one PayNow transfer he had made to the store had been genuine. Once the other payments were found to be unsuccessful, the staff tried to contact the teen, but to no avail. On Apr. 28, 2022, a Bvlgari sales manager lodged a police report against him for the S$2,812 owed to the store. The teen's mother made full restitution the next day. However, the teen continued to use similar tactics to fool businesses from May 28, 2022 to Jun. 7, 2022. He cheated a mobile phone business of an iPhone 13 mini and other accessories worth a total of S$963, again using screenshots of PayNow transfers. He also attempted to cheat a pet shop by trying to show that he had made a S$3,250 deposit for a puppy, though the puppy was not handed over to the accused. Hired locksmiths to steal S$5,610 from uncle's safe Previously, the teen had also stolen S$5,610 from his uncle's safe to pay off his debts from soccer betting. On Nov. 24, 2021, he hired locksmiths to break into his uncle's safe when the latter was not at home. He then took valuables amounting to S$5,610, which he used to pay for an iPhone 11, a portable charger, and lunch at a seafood restaurant. The teen admitted to the theft after being confronted by his mother and uncle, and gave a statement to the police the same night. Arrested in Jun. 2022 The teen was eventually brought in for investigations on Jun. 7, 2022. A staff member at Black Horse Lounge, a bar in Lavender, called the police as they had a dispute with the teen over outstanding bills. He had purchased S$9,476 worth of alcohol and garlands for bar hostesses using dishonest PayNow receipts. The police arrested him at the scene that night. Sentenced to 12 months at RTC The teen was subsequently charged with deception, theft, and false representation of payment to obtain services. He was also charged for agreeing to hand over his Singpass details in exchange for "fast cash". While he was not eventually paid the promised S$1,000, his Singpass login details were used to open a UOB Bank Account in his name. The bank account was eventually used for scams. He pleaded guilty to six charges, with another seven taken into consideration for sentencing. The prosecution pointed out that the accused first gave a statement to the police in November 2021, but "has since gone on to re-offend multiple times with increasing quantum of sums involved despite knowing that there were ongoing investigations". "The accused has demonstrated no regard for the law," the prosecution added. On Apr. 23, he was sentenced to 12 months of reformative training, Shin Min Daily News (Shin Min) reported. Mother had 'no confidence to supervise him' Shin Min also reported that the probation monitoring report stated that the teen's mother did not have the confidence to supervise him. As such, the report recommended that the teen be admitted to the Reformative Training Centre (RTC). In court, the teen had asked the judge if the sentence could be postponed as he "still had things to settle" before going into RTC. The judge agreed to his request and allowed him to serve his sentence from May 24.

SINGAPORE: A recent surge in cocoa prices has caused some small confectioneries in Singapore to branch out from simply selling chocolates in order to save costs and increase revenue. These smaller retailers, which have been hit much harder in terms of profit margins compared with larger stores, are now offering experiential services like chocolate-making workshops. The price of cocoa – the base ingredient of chocolate – has skyrocketed over the past one to two years due to a global supply shortage. Its key producers, Ghana and the Ivory Coast, have been hit by climate change and disease outbreaks. Decades of underinvestment in cocoa plantations as well as investor speculation have also driven prices up. Cocoa futures prices have more than tripled from slightly more than £2,200 (US$2,750) per tonne a year ago to almost £8,800 now. Prices briefly hit an all-time high in March at slightly more than US$10,000 per tonne. “UNPRECEDENTED” INCREASE IN COCOA PRICES Singapore-based artisan chocolatier Anjalichocolat is one retailer that has switched its business model amid such market challenges. It has a physical store in Tanglin Mall and sells its sweet treats online as well. Founder Anjali Gupta told CNA that her company’s small size means it does not buy large enough quantities of sustainable chocolate, which is already priced higher than regular chocolate, to get a bulk discount. “The recent increase in cocoa prices has been unprecedented and it’s definitely given us a curveball,” she said. “If we were to break even, then we would have to increase our prices by about 30 per cent and we don't think our customers can accept that kind of price increase. We will increase our prices slightly and then we would have to manage the other parts of our business.” The firm has held chocolate-making workshops since 2015, which Ms Anjali said have been “very popular” as corporate team-building events. It recently invested in a new workshop studio in Dempsey in January 2023. Another boutique chocolatier, Embrace Chocolate, is paying double the price for raw cocoa beans now compared with the start of the year. The vegan bean-to-bar shop in Joo Chiat, which produces only about 600 chocolate bars every month, is set to pay even more amid the increasing cocoa prices. Founder Namita Gupta said her shop may have to pass on the cost to consumers by S$0.50 to S$1. Cocoa beans used by Singapore bean-to-bar chocolate shop Embrace Chocolate. Ms Namita said suppliers have warned of an upcoming premium, on top of the higher prices they have already been paying. “One thing that we’ve done is we stopped giving any discounts and giveaways … Most of the sales happen over a conversation with customers, so then it’s a bit easier to make them understand why there is an increase in prices,” she added. Ms Namita pointed out the importance of letting the public know about the global cocoa shortage as well. “If people want to continue eating good chocolate, they might have to pay a little more,” she said. DEMAND TO REMAIN HIGH FOR NOW Despite efforts by chocolatiers to absorb costs for now, chocolate prices are expected to remain high in the short term. New cocoa trees take as long as three to four years to produce beans, according to the International Cocoa Organisation, which also estimates that global production of cocoa could drop by 10 per cent this year. Still, economists said demand for chocolate is unlikely to be deterred. Mr Song Seng Wun, economic advisor at CGS-CIMB Securities, said such demand depends on the global labour market and whether people are still earning enough to spend on less essential items like chocolate. “But (in) the near medium term, it is really all about whether governments in key cocoa-producing countries in West Africa invest in the infrastructure in upgrading yield,” he added.

SINGAPORE: DBS and POSB internet banking and payment services were down for some users on Thursday evening (May 2). In a Facebook post at 6.54pm – about an hour after the outage was first reported – DBS said it was aware of the issues. "We have identified the issue and have activated measures to recover the services," said the bank. "You can continue to use your DBS/POSB credit or debit cards to make payment." It added that people could also use the ATMs nearest to them. DBS Wealth clients can contact their relationship managers to place trades, while Vickers and mTrading customers can contact the Vickers hotline at 63272288 for help. "Please be assured that your monies and deposits remain safe. We are sorry for the inconvenience caused," it added. Downdetector showed that users began reporting disruptions with DBS internet banking services at about 5.45pm. A graph from the Downdetector site shows DBS outages on May 2, 2024. In a notice to users on its mobile app, DBS said: "Access to digital services is currently unavailable. We are resolving the issue and will update as soon as services are recovered." In another error message, it said that it was experiencing heavy traffic to its services and urged people to login later. Users commented on the bank's latest Facebook post about the latest outages. In the first of these comments at about 5.58pm, a user said: "Your iBanking is down pls fix it!" Customers reported being unable to access services on the DBS' mobile app and website platforms. Another user reported that he could "log in but can't make any transfer". CNA has contacted DBS for more information. Screenshots of error messages seen on DBS' iBanking mobile app and the POSB digibank app. On Tuesday, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) said that it would not seek to extend the six-month pause on non-essential activities that it imposed on DBS after the bank's multiple service disruptions in 2023. MAS added that it will retain the multiplier of 1.8 times for DBS' risk-weighted assets for operational risk until the bank "has demonstrated the ability to maintain service availability and reliability, and handle any disruptions effectively". The penalty was imposed in May 2023, up from the 1.5 times that was implemented in February 2022. The authority noted on Tuesday that DBS has since made "substantive progress" to address the shortcomings identified from the service disruptions last year, even as efforts to implement its remediation plan are ongoing. MAS said it would closely monitor the bank's progress and the effectiveness of the measures. "In the event of service disruptions, MAS expects DBS to promptly recover its services and communicate to its customers in a clear and timely manner," it said. DBS said on Tuesday that being able to resume its activities "will not dilute its focus on strengthening technology resiliency and enhancing digital service availability". RECORD PROFITS DBS, Singapore's largest lender, announced earlier on Thursday that its financial results for the first quarter of the year had surpassed expectations. It expects net profit to exceed last year's record result. The bank's net profit jumped 15 per cent from the same period a year earlier to S$2.96 billion (US$2.2 billion), compared with market expectations for a 3.5 per cent decline. DBS CEO Piyush Gupta said that the bank has been working on improving service availability, better monitoring and recovering services more quickly in the event that something goes wrong. "We've done a lot of the heavy lifting, but in truth, we still have more work to do," he said. In response to a question from the media, the CEO said DBS has completed around 90 per cent of what needs to be done, but there are still some things to be addressed. "If I were to hazard a guess in terms of what we need to get done, it's going to take us most of this year," he said. Source: CNA/nh(mi)

In short all forever alone better

Their kids will feel blessed paying 1 million hdb housing loan

Jack

Sinkies votes for this to happen. Can only blame themselves

A woman was caught on video tripping a young boy and causing him to fall at United Square shopping mall on May 1. Stomper John alerted Stomp to the incident and shared CCTV footage of the woman caught in the act. "This crazy woman attacked an innocent child for no reason!" he said. In the video, she is seen approaching the boy from behind and sticking out her leg, causing him to trip and fall. She then walks away before she is stopped by the boy's father. The Stomper's footage also included photos of the woman holding a Toys 'R' Us wrapped package while being confronted. H told Stomp the CCTV footage was provided by the manager of a bubble tea stall in the mall. "The family walked out from the nearby Toys 'R' Us when the woman walked behind them and suddenly kicked the young child at his calf, causing him to fall," said John. "The child's father saw it and immediately stopped the woman who tried to deny it and wanted to escape." The Stomper said he saw the boy's parents and the mall's security guards stop the woman who was overheard saying she was also a mother. "The father of the victim then said: 'You should be very ashamed of yourself for attacking a child when you are a mother!'," said the Stomper. "There was no reason given about why she kicked the child. "Throughout the entire episode, the poor child appeared extremely traumatised." John added that police officers arrived shortly afterwards but the woman remained 'unapologetic and aggressive' towards the family.

Ayeesha was only five when she died in the toilet in her home from a head injury after her father, who had martial arts training, relentlessly smacked her. When her broken body finally gave up in 2017 after two years of abuse, it was riddled with multiple scars, marks and other external injuries. She was also severely malnourished. Her father had started ill-treating Ayeesha and her brother, who is a year younger, in 2015. He underfed the toddlers, causing the girl, who was only three then, and her brother to be so hungry that they ate their own faeces and the stuffing of a mattress. He also assaulted them and confined them naked in the toilet for 10 months. The siblings were below the third percentile of their age group, which meant that 97 per cent of the other children in their age group were bigger and heavier than them. Besides being severely undernourished, Ayeesha’s brother was diagnosed with global developmental delay due to social deprivation. He had to undergo physiotherapy, occupational therapy and speech therapy. When he was admitted to hospital after being rescued, he was not able to stand by himself despite being almost four years old. He spent more than three months in hospital, before he was well enough to be placed in foster care. On April 30, the 44-year-old man was sentenced by the High Court to an unprecedented jail term of 34½ years and 12 strokes of the cane. He pleaded guilty to a reduced charge of culpable homicide for the girl’s death, four charges of child abuse, and one charge of disposing of evidence. Another 20 charges, for child abuse and for lying to the police, were taken into consideration. He was originally charged with murder for the death, and went on trial in July 2023. Part-way through the trial, he accepted the prosecution’s offer to amend the charge. The two victims were his children from his previous marriage. He married his second wife, 33, who has a 12-year-old daughter from her previous marriage, in 2015. They have three children together. The man cannot be named owing to a gag order to protect the identity of his son, who survived the abuse. Justice Aedit Abdullah, however, lifted the gag order in relation to the first name of the daughter “so that society may remember her”. The High Court judge agreed with prosecutors that the man deserved an unprecedented sentence. Justice Abdullah said: “The sentence is heavy. It is unprecedented perhaps, but your acts were unprecedented and hopefully will remain unsurpassed in cruelty.” The two children suffered “sadistic and cruel” physical abuse, and were also mentally and emotionally traumatised, said the judge. “Your children depended on you for love, care and nurturing. Instead, you subjected them to inhumane, disgusting abuse,” he said, adding that the man had essentially used the children as “punching bags for whatever frustration or anger” he felt. The judge said the punishment reflected a denouncement of such “loathsome and sickening acts” and served to deter others from committing any abuse of this kind. Three video clips were played in court on April 30 as prosecutors narrated the sequence of events, providing a glimpse into the man’s horrendous treatment of the two children. One video, from the family’s own closed-circuit television (CCTV) camera, shows the man inflicting at least 86 forceful blows on Ayeesha during a 16-minute assault that took place on March 27, 2016. The man assaults her in anger as he is changing her diaper after she smears her faeces on the wall. In the video, Ayeesha and her brother can be seen wearing only diapers. They are barricaded in the “naughty corner” of a one-room flat. In the video, he repeatedly slaps her, pounds her face with his fists, kicks her and canes her, as she cowers in fear. He also points a pair of scissors at her, grabs her by the hair and lifts her up against a wall by the neck while punching her. After the attack, he wipes the blood from her face and cleans a blood stain off the wall. In another video, captured on Aug 27, 2016, the man repeatedly canes the two children, who were in a double-seater pram in the living room. Justice Abdullah asked prosecutors about the man’s wife, and Deputy Public Prosecutor Norine Tan replied that the prosecution will be reviewing the case against her. The man’s two children were initially placed in foster care in June 2014, after their parents divorced. In early 2015, the children were returned to the care and custody of the man, who was their main caregiver. After the two children were returned to their father, staff from a family service centre, which worked with the Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF), continued checking on their welfare. In May 2015, he took the two children along with him to attend a counselling session at the centre. Since then, the children were not seen by any case officer and had not attended any school. On subsequent visits, he lied to the case officers that the children were staying with his mother or other relatives. The man and his wife initially provided the two children with three meals a day, but he cut this down to two meals a day when he started facing financial difficulties. The two children began playing with, and eating, their own faeces because they were hungry. Towards the end of 2015, the man and his wife began hitting Ayeesha, who was then three years old, and her brother, who was only two. From February to October 2016, the couple confined the children in a “naughty corner”, with a bookshelf and a wardrobe to block their escape. The man also installed a camera to monitor the children. The children were let out only during meal and bathing times. Meanwhile, the abuse continued. In October 2016, the man called the case officer and asked for the children to be placed in foster care as he feared that he might harm them out of frustration. He said he wanted to give the children up for adoption, and was given contact details of the adoption service, but ultimately did not follow through with it. He and his wife were told that the adoption process could not proceed unless the biological mother also gave consent or unless MSF could facilitate the dispensation of her consent. That month, the couple moved the naughty corner to the toilet, and the man installed a camera in the kitchen to monitor the children. On the night of Aug 10, 2017, his wife complained to him that Ayeesha refused her instructions to move her legs. The man then pulled Ayeesha up by her arm, smacked her 15 to 20 times on her face, and went to bed. At about 3am on Aug 11, 2017, the wife complained to the man that the children were sleeping in a weird posture. The man then punched the children on their backs, kicked and stamped on Ayeesha, and slapped her face. That evening, the man’s wife realised that Ayeesha was unresponsive. Upon realising that Ayeesha was dead, the man told his wife to file a police report against him for beating her up and raping her, supposedly as part of a cover-up plan. In the early hours of Aug 12, 2017, he threw away evidence, including the CCTV camera, into different rubbish bins at nearby blocks. He then placed his son and Ayeesha’s body into a pram, and went to Singapore General Hospital (SGH). He lied to SGH staff that the girl became unresponsive only that morning. After Ayeesha was pronounced dead by the doctors, the police were alerted about the case. The man continued to lie to police officers and fabricated a story about Ayeesha hitting her head on a slide at a playground. It was only when he was confronted with footage from police surveillance cameras that contradicted his story, that he admitted to these lies.

A misunderstanding over whether a neck gaiter could be used as a mask amid the Covid-19 pandemic restrictions on public transport turned into a criminal case, when a man used vulgar language to insult an SBS Transit bus driver. Nimal De Silva, a self-employed music teacher, even live-streamed the entire confrontation, which took place in August 2020, compounding Mr Xu Bo’s humiliation, the prosecution said. De Silva, a 46-year-old Singaporean, was sentenced to a week in jail on April 30. District Judge Lau Qiuyu had earlier convicted the Singaporean offender of a harassment charge following a trial in January 2024. De Silva will be appealing against his conviction and sentence, and his bail was set at $15,000 on April 30. In September 2021, he had pleaded guilty to a similar harassment charge over this case. However, his plea was set aside the following month after the defence lawyer Luke Netto disagreed with the prosecution’s submissions which stated that his client had used “racist and xenophobic” language on Mr Xu, a 55-year-old Chinese national. On Aug 19, 2020, the day of the offence, De Silva had travelled by bus and MRT wearing a neck gaiter, which can be worn over a person’s neck and lower half of the face for protection from sun and wind. At that time, it was compulsory to wear a mask in public due to the Covid-19 pandemic. At around 6pm, De Silva tried to board bus service 196 at a bus stop along Nicoll Highway wearing the neck gaiter, instead of a mask. Deputy Public Prosecutor Cheah Wenjie said Mr Xu “was uncertain as to whether or not the neck gaiter worn by the accused was compliant with SBS Transit’s mask-on policy aboard buses” and did not allow De Silva to enter the bus. “At the same time, the victim contacted the SBS Transit operation centre to seek clarification on whether the neck gaiter was compliant with SBS Transit’s mask-on policy aboard buses,” the prosecutor added. According to court documents, a dissatisfied De Silva used a door cock outside the bus to open the doors to the vehicle, and boarded it. He began to live-stream the incident on Facebook Live, and filmed himself confronting Mr Xu with his mobile phone. Among other things, De Silva had said: “This is the problem when you have China people working in Singapore.” Throughout the confrontation, Mr Xu, who was not conversant in English, continued trying to seek verification from the SBS Transit operations centre over the radio as to whether De Silva’s neck gaiter was compliant with the public transport operator’s mask-on policy aboard buses. The DPP told the court: “The victim tried to get the SBS Transit operations centre to speak to the accused, but was informed that the...centre would be calling for police assistance. “The victim communicated this to the accused, and also tried repeatedly to explain to the accused that he was simply following the rules regarding SBS Transit’s mask-on policy aboard buses.” At one point, an unnamed passenger on the bus was heard on the video footage offering De Silva a mask to resolve the issue. De Silva refused the offer and said that he did not want to “give in”. Due to the situation, Mr Xu could not continue driving the bus. The passengers on the bus had to alight and wait for the next service 196. Amid the pandemic, the Ministry of Health (MOH) website had earlier stated: “A mask that closely and completely covers the nose and mouth (without leaving a gap between the mask and the face) must be worn when persons go out of their homes.” “MOH does not recommend the use of neck gaiters and bandanas as masks,” said a ministry spokesperson in 2020.

ok i get aero and save money

thanks for sharing all these, i dont want become siaolang. i stick with robot or AP. dont want poison my mind then spend more and more. i jsut stay dumb better

heng i out already

WTf so many design which sites to see all these coffer machine in sg? but highly unlike i coffer machine if over 200 to 300

WOW it so good, they must have started not long ago, i dont remember CTK have any good espresso machine 12 yr ago. that machine is usd 730

all waiting for enbloc kovan i many atb for piak piak. tht why both hotel there, i used to go ussc weekly so i see many atb in and out of both hotel often

no more, now is ppl staying at the very top and one level down is empty space

A Chinese tourist flew a drone near the Parliament Building and was taken away by the police for investigation. The Chinese Embassy in Singapore issued a document reminding citizens to abide by my country's drone operation regulations. The Chinese Embassy in Singapore posted on its WeChat official account on Wednesday (May 1): "A few days ago, a Chinese citizen flew a drone near the Parliament Buildings of Singapore in order to record a "wonderful moment" during his trip to Singapore. He was arrested by the New Zealand police. Take him away to assist in the investigation and have an impact on his subsequent journey.” The Chinese Embassy in Singapore also reminded Chinese tourists visiting our country and Chinese citizens in our country to enhance their legal awareness and not to fly drones at will. According to the law, it is illegal to operate a drone within certain areas, such as within five kilometers of an airport or air force base, within a restricted area, a protected area, or to fly at an altitude of 200 feet above sea level without a permit. Violators may be fined up to $50,000, jailed for up to two years, or both. Data released by the Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore in April this year shows that the authorities took enforcement actions against 309 incidents of illegal use of drones in 2023. Among them, eight people and seven companies were charged in court, with fines ranging from 4,000 yuan to 4,000 yuan. 5,000 yuan.

A woman's body was found floating on the Singapore River near the Clarke Quay area on Apr. 26, 2024. According to Shin Min Daily News, the identity of the woman was established as 33-year-old Vietnamese Dang Hoang Ly Na. Roland Tay, the undertaker who helped arrange for her body to be sent back to Vietnam, told Shin Min that he decided to offer his services for free. This was after he found out that she's a single mother living in a small village with an 11-year-old daughter. Tay wanted her daughter to be able to see her for the last time. Shin Min reported that Dang had only come to Singapore to work for less than a week before her demise. According to Shin Min, Dang had lung problems but still decided to come to Singapore to work at a night entertainment outlet as she, as a single child, has aged parents at home and needed money for her family. It was previously reported that the police received reports of a body in the Singapore River at around 11am on Apr. 26. Preliminary investigations ruled out foul play. Further investigations are still ongoing.

no worry, no plan to buy all these, i quit already , no way i going to burn cash like 12 yr ago either robot or AP, but i will read up more first

Kew Ong Yah Temple? massage at space @kovan?? space@kovan is clean up already that area is not the worst mall, the worst one is the one i jsut updated my last post liv and the village for me is the worst,

fake, he did not go to the a few hidden area. only the real pro know where is it. i not saying i am but i am. muhahahaha his type of mall explore is boring, must go to the real hidden area, that where the fun is like this from 10.17 min onwards. not many ppl know where is it, there no cam there. another is at carpark LOL, the worst mall in sg wait till he go here