Senior Minister of State for Health Tan Kiat How said Singapore is strengthening suicide prevention through mental health programmes, while Workers’ Party MP He Ting Ru sought clarity on male suicides, national strategy and provisional statistics.   https://news.theonlinecitizen.com/2026/09/10/tan-kiat-how-says-suicide-prevention-needs-whole-of-society-effort-as-singapore-strengthens-support-and-resilience   Here's the full detailed account of the parliamentary debate — 10 Sep 2026:       Overview   - MP: He Ting Ru (WP, Sengkang GRC) - Respondent: Tan Kiat How, Senior Minister of State for Health - Context: World Suicide Prevention Day; suicide has been leading cause of death for 10–29 age group for 7 straight years        1. Key Statistics Cited   Metric Detail  2024 final suicide deaths 441[__LINK_ICON]  Male proportion ~65.8% (290 of 441)[__LINK_ICON]  Age 30–39 increase ↑50% — from 66 (2023) → 99 (2024)  Leading cause — youths 10–29 Yes, 7th consecutive year[__LINK_ICON]  Provisional → Final gap ~35–40% upward revision (e.g. 2023: provisional 322 → final 434)[__LINK_ICON]  Overall rate Lower than most developed economies[__LINK_ICON]        2. He Ting Ru’s Three Core Questions   A. Male Suicide — Why the Disparity?   - Men consistently form majority of deaths across nearly all developed economies - SOS data: women = 1/3 of deaths but 2/3 of help-seeking contacts - Asked: what specific factors drive this pattern, and what targeted interventions exist?   B. Call for a Formal National Suicide Prevention Strategy   - Advocacy groups including Project Hayat released white paper urging a dedicated, coordinated national strategy - Asked: timeline for launch; how would it differ from existing programmes?   C. Provisional vs Final Statistics   - Revisions are 35–40% higher when finalised  - Causes confusion and challenges for frontline organisations - Asked: why so large? Can gap be narrowed? Can final figures be released sooner?       3. Tan Kiat How’s Responses   On Provisional Statistics — Why the Gap Exists   - Provisional figures published timely for transparency but some deaths await coroner’s inquiries  - Pending confirmation → categorised under "unclassified causes" → reclassified as suicide once coroner concludes → upward revision  - Govt working with agencies to expedite confirmation; no single figure can perfectly bridge the gap until inquiries close   On Male Suicide & Help-Seeking   - Men less likely to reach out: "The person who needs help may be the one least likely to ask for it" - Cannot rely solely on self-referral → equip families, friends, colleagues to spot distress - Multi-pronged approach: - Reduce stigma around mental health & help-seeking - Boost suicide literacy — teach public to recognise warning signs - Build mental resilience early, especially in schools - Strengthen post-crisis support after discharge  - Broader protective factors matter: stable society, family support, housing, education, healthcare   On a "National Strategy" — Name vs Action   - Formal title is secondary to coordinated action already underway  - Existing whole-of-society framework spans: - Youth Resilience Plan → early intervention & protective factors - Crisis response coordination across healthcare, schools, community groups - Post-discharge community reintegration support - IMH research identifying risk/protective factors - Partnerships with SOS, community groups & helpline services  - Reiterated: "Every suicide is painful… prevention must continue"; will monitor & adapt programmes   On the 30–39 Age Group Spike   - IMH study finds multifactorial drivers: relationships, financial/work stress, physical health, mental health combined - This cohort faces peak responsibilities — careers, caregiving, family pressure - Response: embed support across community & workplace settings alongside clinical care       4. Key Themes & Positions   Issue He Ting Ru / Advocates Govt / Tan Kiat How  National strategy Formal, dedicated plan needed Programmes exist; "strategy" label not the priority  Male disparity Needs targeted, gender-specific approach Agrees; focus on literacy & others spotting distress  Statistical revisions Gap too large; confuses public & planners Technical — coroner delays; improving timeliness  Youth focus Leading cause of death — urgent action Youth Resilience Plan + school-based CARE teams in place[__LINK_ICON]  Who acts Central leadership & clear accountability Whole-of-society: Govt + community + families + peers        5. What Happens Next   - ✅ Continue publishing both provisional & final data transparently - ✅ Improve coroner → statistics workflow to compress revision window - ✅ Expand suicide literacy training & community-based early warning systems - ✅ Strengthen post-discharge & workplace mental health support - ⏳ No fixed date for standalone national strategy — current framework to evolve   "Suicide prevention requires coordinated action across government, communities, families, friends and colleagues." — Tan Kiat How         

WP's Jackson Au calls out 'internet brigading' campaign to discredit Aljunied MP Kenneth Tiong : Mr Au wrote that Kenneth Tiong "faced intense scrutiny. Some of this has taken the form of civil and robust debate, but the majority has descended into unwarranted character attacks, fuelled by what I perceive to be a coordinated campaign to discredit him."   🔗 Read more: https://theindependent.sg/wp-s-jackson-au-calls-out-internet-brigading-campaign-to-discredit-aljunied-mp-kenneth-tiong/   Here's the full detailed account of the story:       Background: What Triggered the Controversy   - Aug 2026: Air India sought an additional US$1.5 billion (S$1.9b) in fresh equity from shareholders — Tata Sons (74.9%) and SIA (25.1%) — after posting record losses - Aug 26: WP Aljunied MP Kenneth Tiong posted publicly: - SIA is ~50% owned by Temasek, so any funding call affects Singapore’s national investment funds - "No one, least of all Singaporeans, owes Air India a living" - Opposed using Temasek funds to prop up Air India via SIA - Filed parliamentary questions for Sep 8 sitting asking whether government would rule out future direct support and set funding limits - Online backlash followed: Accusations that Tiong was dog-whistling / being xenophobic; questions raised about his qualifications to challenge SIA’s investment decisions       Jackson Au’s Statement — Sep 7, 2026   WP’s Jackson Au (Punggol GE2025 candidate) issued a Facebook defence of Tiong:   "For his trouble, he has faced intense scrutiny. Some of this has taken the form of civil and robust debate, but the majority has descended into unwarranted character attacks, fuelled by what I perceive to be a coordinated campaign to discredit him."   Specific Allegations — "Internet Brigading"   - AI-generated videos circulated depicting Tiong in false, demeaning scenarios: - Assaulting airline staff - Crashing a plane - Shouting at wheelchair‑using passengers - Au called the content "racist, vitriolic, and tasteless" — refused to share it but highlighted its depravity - Urged authorities to identify and act against those responsible   Rebuttal of "Xenophobia" Claims   - Labelled accusations that Tiong is racist "politically nefarious" - Stressed Tiong was simply asking hard questions on behalf of constituents — his concerns were commercial and fiduciary, not racial       Key Related Developments   Kenneth Tiong’s Own Clarification — Sep 5   - Reiterated his concerns were purely commercial, not racial - Stated: "Singaporeans are best served when we can hold two things at once: zero tolerance for racism & hard questions about money" - Senior Minister K. Shanmugam had earlier condemned racist/xenophobic online comments linked to the SIA–Air India discussion, warning against politicising Temasek investment decisions    Parliamentary Exchange — Sep 8   - Transport Minister Jeffrey Siow defended SIA’s investment, said losses weren’t threatening SIA’s core function - Did not rule out future government backstop nor identify any funding cap when pressed by Tiong   Public Reaction   - Many backed Au’s call: debate the issues, not the person - One comment: "Personal attacks and racist content have no place in the conversation… We need more constructive dialogue, not more hostility."       Summary Table   Aspect Detail  Actor Kenneth Tiong (WP, Aljunied GRC)  Action Question SIA/Air India funding; oppose Temasek exposure  Response faced Charges of xenophobia; AI‑generated smear videos; coordinated character attacks  Defended by Jackson Au (WP) — Sep 7 Facebook post  Key Au quote Majority criticism = "unwarranted character attacks… coordinated campaign to discredit him"  Parliament outcome Minister Siow declined to rule out future support / set limit  Core divide Tiong: protect public funds → Govt: don’t politicise commercial investment decisions         

Workers Party’s He Ting Ru calling ministers out for talking while she... | he ting ru singapore | TikTok      

Hannar hannar, growing xdd often nid to jiak 2 portions to grow taller mah whhh

You with blonde @ManOfTheHour   https://www.threads.com/@rottenraptor444/post/DdDQ4hnCQmY