All Leonard Teo wanted was to answer nature's call in peace.  Instead, he claims he repeatedly found himself dealing with alleged voyeurs in a Serangoon mall toilet. The 33-year-old videographer took to TikTok to warn others about this particular toilet in a shopping centre in Serangoon, where he claimed to have encountered six voyeurism cases during the two years where he worked nearby. Of these, he has called the police thrice – however, two of the cases were dropped due to a lack of evidence. Teo re-enacted the first of the six incidents in a video uploaded on July 20. Recounting his first alleged encounter, Teo said he was in a cubicle when he noticed someone peering at him through holes in the cubicle door, which he says had been left behind after an old lock was removed. "My mind went blank instantly. I have never been faced with such a situation," he said. "But just as quickly as the eye was there, it disappeared." Shocked at what had happened, and needing to clean himself up, Teo said he took a while to leave the cubicle.  By the time he emerged, the alleged voyeur had disappeared. Reflecting on how he could have handled the situation differently, Teo said he later returned to the toilet with his phone camera ready to catch the perpetrator in the act, but he did not show up again – or so he thought. Alleged voyeur returned 2 weeks later In a separate video uploaded on Tuesday (Aug 4), Teo went on to explain the other five encounters. He said that the second incident happened about two weeks after the first, where he alleged that the voyeur was the same person as the man from the first one. "This person was about to look through the hole when I open the door. This was when I confronted him," he said. However, he said that the man shouted back at him and started to put his hands behind his back. Fearing that the man may have a weapon, Teo called the police, where he was advised to use another toilet. However, Teo says the police only took his statement as there was insufficient evidence to arrest the man. Suspects allegedly peered through holes, under partitions The third incident involved a different individual who allegedly tried to look under the cubicle partition. When he reacted by slamming the partition, Teo said the man fled. As Teo was in the middle of using the toilet, he was unable to follow up. Following these encounters, Teo began stuffing toilet paper into the holes to "block the vision", and would look at the shoes through the gap of the cubicle in an attempt to identify the suspicious individuals. In a fourth case, he told AsiaOne that someone had pushed aside the toilet paper he had used to block the holes. When Teo confronted the man who did so, the man denied the accusations. Teo says he then dragged the man to the management office. He also called the police on the man, but said no action was taken due to a lack of photographic evidence. Mirror allegedly used to spy from neighbouring cubicle Teo said two later incidents involved an individual allegedly using a pocket mirror to look into neighbouring cubicles. The fifth incident was brief, with the mirror disappearing before he could identify the person. Months later, he said he spotted what appeared to be the same red mirror and struck it, causing it to fall and break. The man allegedly fled before Teo could stop him. Teo reported the case to the security, and while walking back spotted a man in a pair of white slippers similar to what the man was wearing in the neighbouring cubicle. "I wasn't hundred percent sure this was the person, so I just asked him, 'were you the one who looked at me'?" Teo explained in the video. The man did not give him a response, which made Teo feel even more suspicious. He proceeded to call the police for the third time, where the CCTV footage managed to capture the man leaving the toilet. This prompted a police investigation into the case, he said. In response to queries from AsiaOne, the police confirmed that a report was lodged and that investigations are ongoing. Toilet allegedly known as a cruising spot After the incidents, Teo said he searched online and discovered forum discussions describing the toilet as a long-standing cruising spot. Some forum posts he found online even suggested that visitors could "get lucky" in that toilet and be "rewarded with a nice show". He claimed to have witnessed two separate incidents involving naked men in the toilet. In one case, he alleged that a man was masturbating before retreating into a cubicle. In another, a naked man quickly left when spotted. Just as he was about to report the case to security, he said that a boy from a nearby martial arts class had just walked into the toilet and nearly missed the man. "Can you imagine if this kid saw what happened there?" he said in the video. In the comments section of his video, some noted that this toilet has been known for such activities from as long as 40 years ago. This was corroborated by Teo's conversations with long-time tenants and people working in the mall who told him that they had experienced or witnessed similar incidents over the years. "From those conversations, I understood that management had already been trying to address the issue," he said told AsiaOne. Teo added that the mall's management has sealed up the holes in the cubicle door with nails and changed the locks in response to the issue. The management has patched up the holes of the toilet with nails. PHOTO: Leonard Teo However, he said that he had heard of people who would bring tools along to destroy them. AsiaOne has reached out to the mall's management for more information. 'Public toilets are shared spaces': Teo Speaking to AsiaOne, Teo said that he had initially tried to ignore these incidents and to "simply move on" from them. "However, after multiple encounters – including incidents involving alleged peeping and indecent exposure – I realised this wasn't an isolated experience," he told AsiaOne. "Just do your own thing, leave me alone, and I'll be fine," Teo said. "But when you harass me, I will find a way to shut you down, because come on man, I just want to poop in peace."  The turning point for him was the sixth incident, which was when he decided to raise awareness about the repeated voyeurism in the toilet. Teo also told AsiaOne that he noticed how families and children used the same public toilets, which made him feel like this was not just about his experience anymore. "My intention isn't to stigmatise any community. My concern has always been about behaviour that invades another person's privacy or sense of safety," he said. "Public toilets are shared spaces, and everyone deserves to feel safe while using them. If someone experiences suspicious behaviour, I hope they won't dismiss it or assume they're overreacting."  He also encouraged members of the public to report suspicious behaviour to the authorities or mall management.

432 students said the O-Level English oral examination showed the wrong questions. So, what really happened? Watch this and be even more…confused:   👉       This video investigates a viral controversy surrounding the Singapore O-Level English oral examination on July 15, 2026.    The Incident: During the exam, students viewed a video about street barbers and were asked a specific question. While the Ministry of Education stated the question was "Who do you think would go to a place like this for a haircut? Why do you say so?", hundreds of students (reaching 432 across 102 schools) claimed they saw a different, personal version of the question (e.g., "Would you go?") (1:36 - 2:42).   Official Investigation: The Singapore Examinations and Assessment Board (SEAB) and GovTech conducted audits, confirming that the digital systems were not hacked and that the same material was delivered to all centers (2:45 - 3:15, 4:04 - 4:33).    Officials noted that some recovered planning sheets showed students initially misreading the prompt before correcting it (4:42 - 4:56).   Outcomes and Explanations: Academic Impact: Preliminary results indicate that students who reported the discrepancy performed comparably to their peers, as examiners focus on overall language skills rather than rigid answers (5:34 - 6:13).   Scientific Theories: The video discusses why this happened, noting that it does not fit the definition of the Mandela Effect or mass psychogenic illness. The most plausible, though unproven, theory is memory conformity, where students' recollections were influenced by discussions with others after the exam (6:41 - 8:44).