sinkie also so kumlan to buy such investment

MND will publish what public feedback changed. Whether MSE shaped the plans remains unclear   https://theonlinecitizen.com/2026/08/07/mnd-will-publish-what-public-feedback-changed-whether-mse-shaped-the-plans-remains-unclear?fbclid=IwdGRjcATjvR1jbGNrBOO9GHBkb2YFZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQMMzUwNjg1NTMxNzI4AAEe5mKjRZuErn38TcU-5Qc71nFP7okJxjf3ZC0F8SFUi0rTXFEs2bntq34d1vM_aem_KrF7rzpu4hn-AqdK8qCLMw     Full Details: MND to Publish Public Feedback Outcomes; MSE’s Influence on Plans Unclear   (Source: The Online Citizen, 7 Aug 2026)       Context: Parliamentary Debate (4 Aug) on Gillman Barracks & Maju Forest   Workers' Party MP Kenneth Tiong raised questions:   - Asked why the Ministry of Sustainability and the Environment (MSE) seemed “missing” from decisions on these two forested sites — this came in Singapore’s Year of Climate Adaptation. - Also asked: what threshold of documented environmental harm would lead to a site being protected instead of developed? Both sites’ impact assessments rated biodiversity harm as “major negative”.   Official Responses:   - MOS Alvin Tan (MND): Rejected claims MSE was absent. Said MND consults MSE, MSE gives feedback, and the two ministries work closely together. - Grace Fu (Minister for MSE): Stated it is not government practice for ministers to publicly disagree or break ranks once an official position is settled. “When one minister states the government’s stance, the rest support it.” She added hopes for infighting between ministries would be disappointed. Later, on social media, she clarified: - MND holds the mandate for land-use planning & zoning — MSE is consulted but does not decide land use. - All ministries contribute, differences are resolved internally, and the Cabinet takes collective responsibility for final decisions.       What Is Confirmed & What Remains Unclear   ✅ Confirmed: MSE was consulted and provided input during the process. There is no public evidence MSE openly disagreed with MND’s plans.   ❌ Still Unclear:   - What specific environmental advice/assessments MSE/NParks gave, how much weight it carried, or if it actually changed development plans in any concrete way. The internal process of “reconciling differences” remains opaque to the public. - No clear decision threshold was given: Ministers did not define how severe environmental damage must be for a site to be fully spared rather than developed with mitigation measures.       MND’s Transparency Commitment   During the debate, Dr Charlene Chen pressed MND to disclose how public input shaped outcomes.   - Alvin Tan promised: MND will publish a report summarising government agencies’ responses to public feedback, plus any changes made to original plans as a result. He added consultation will continue — details like layout, scale, retained greenery and heritage features can still be adjusted.   Key Limitation of the Promise: The commitment only covers public feedback, not internal expert advice. It is not confirmed whether the report will reveal:   - Recommendations from MSE or NParks - If environmental agencies pushed for more forest/habitat protection - How environmental concerns were weighed against housing/development goals       Broader Accountability Concerns   - Singapore has pledged international commitments (e.g. Glasgow Leaders’ Declaration on Forests & Land Use) and domestic goals (e.g. Green Plan’s “City in Nature”). It is unknown how these were measured against the Gillman/Maju development plans, or if the plans were found aligned with them. - Potential conflict of interest: NParks — the agency in charge of biodiversity protection — is itself a statutory board under MND, the same ministry in charge of development planning. This raises questions over independent checks and balances.       Core Takeaway   The promised public feedback report is a chance for greater transparency — but right now, the public still cannot see how environmental expertise shaped the final decisions, only that it was part of internal discussions. The report will be the key test of whether full accountability is delivered.

Executive Summary We often talk about extreme heat in terms of physical dangers—like heatstroke, dehydration, or sunburns. But a growing mountain of global research reveals a hidden, equally dangerous consequence of rising temperatures: heat directly alters brain chemistry, disrupts emotional regulation, and worsens mental health conditions. From everyday irritability to severe psychiatric emergencies, extreme temperatures take a measurable toll on how we think, feel, and behave. This report breaks down the scientific consensus into clear, simple insights. 1. What Happens to the Brain in High Heat? When your body gets hot, it works overtime to cool itself down. Blood is redirected toward the skin to sweat and release heat, leaving less energy and blood flow for the brain. Key Physiological Triggers:  * Serotonin Breakdown: Serotonin is the chemical in our brain responsible for regulating mood, anxiety, and happiness. High temperatures disrupt serotonin production and transmission, leading to sudden mood drops and increased aggression.  * Elevated Stress Hormones: Heat acts as a physical stressor, triggering the release of cortisol (the body's primary stress hormone) and adrenaline. This keeps the nervous system on high alert—making you feel "on edge."  * Sleep Deprivation: The body needs to cool down internally to fall into deep sleep. Hot nights cause poor sleep quality, which compounds irritability, anxiety, and emotional instability the following day. 2. The Emotional Spectrum: From Irritability to Aggression You don't need to have a pre-existing psychiatric condition to feel the mental impacts of a heatwave. Research shows a direct correlation between heat spikes and changes in daily social behavior:  * Lower Frustration Tolerance: Hotter weather shrinks our patience. Minor inconveniences—like traffic jams or slow lines—are far more likely to provoke outbursts or road rage.  * Increased Violent Behavior: Historical and global data consistently show that domestic disputes, violent crime, and verbal hostility peak during unusually hot days and warmer months.  * Cognitive Fatigue: High temperatures reduce attention span, memory retention, and decision-making clarity, making everyday tasks feel significantly more exhausting. 3. Severe Impacts on Vulnerable Populations While heat affects everyone, it poses disproportionate risks to specific groups: A. Individuals with Pre-existing Mental Health Conditions People living with depression, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or anxiety experience heightened distress during extreme heat. Heatwaves are statistically linked to increased emergency room visits and hospital admissions for psychiatric crises. B. The Hidden Danger of Psychiatric Medications Many common medications—including antidepressants, antipsychotics, and lithium—interfere with the body’s natural ability to regulate heat or sweat. This makes individuals taking these medications significantly more vulnerable to both heatstroke and sudden psychological distress. C. The Link to Self-Harm and Suicide Risks Multiple long-term studies across Asian regions (including Taiwan and China) and globally demonstrate a clear, tragic pattern: sudden temperature increases and extreme heat waves are statistically correlated with rises in suicide rates. Rapid seasonal shifts into high heat create physiological stress that can overwhelm vulnerable individuals. Conclusion Heat is not just a weather condition; it is a neurological and psychological stressor. As global temperatures continue to rise, recognizing the invisible impact of heat on our mental well-being is vital. By treating heat exposure as both a physical and mental health priority, communities can better support one another through warmer seasons. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266727822500029X How heat affects the mind https://www.apa.org/monitor/2024/06/heat-affects-mental-health Psychiatry.org - Extreme Heat Can Take a Toll on Mental Health https://www.psychiatry.org/news-room/apa-blogs/extreme-heat-can-take-a-toll-on-mental-health How High Temps Can Affect Stress and Mood - APG Health https://www.apghealth.com/blog/how-high-temps-can-affect-stress-and-mood/ The Effect of Temperature on Mental Health: Evidence from China | Atlantis Press https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/isemss-22/125982294 (PDF) Associations between ambient high temperatures and suicide mortality: a multi-city time-series study in China https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333177658_Associations_between_ambient_high_temperatures_and_suicide_mortality_a_multi-city_time-series_study_in_China (PDF) Temperature change dominates the suicidal seasonality in Taiwan: A time-series analysis https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51864129_Temperature_change_dominates_the_suicidal_seasonality_in_Taiwan_A_time-series_analysis Hot Heads and Heavy Hearts: How Rising Temperatures Impact Our Brains, Moods, and Mental Health

krzz Ji Eun