[quote][b]
Aftermath: The girl was humiliated but did not report it immediately, fearing it would cause conflict between her parents. She only disclosed the matter four months later, on March 26, 2024, to a Central Narcotics Bureau officer during a urine test, then filed a police report the same day.[/b][/quote]
@coffeenut
Man, 64, allegedly filmed adoptive daughter showering and made 144 copies of nude photos
The girl had been raised by the man and his wife since she was five days old before they formally adopted her.
🤳🏼 https://stmp.sg/z3cK
@stompteam
Full Case Details
Published: Aug 2, 2026, 3:34 am | Updated: Aug 2, 2026, 3:37 am
Source: Shin Min Daily News / STOMP, by Cherry Tan
Accused & Charge
- A 64‑year‑old man faces one count of voyeurism under Singapore’s Penal Code. His identity is withheld by court order to protect the victim.
- The victim is his 17‑year‑old adoptive daughter, whom he and his wife had cared for since she was five days old, before formally adopting her.
Incident Details
- Date & Time: Dec 12, 2023, about 6 pm
- Location: Common bathroom next to the kitchen
- Alleged Act: The man held his phone with a black case outside the bathroom window to secretly photograph her while she showered. When she noticed the phone and crouched down to avoid being seen, he raised the phone higher and continued for 1–2 minutes.
- Aftermath: The girl was humiliated but did not report it immediately, fearing it would cause conflict between her parents. She only disclosed the matter four months later, on March 26, 2024, to a Central Narcotics Bureau officer during a urine test, then filed a police report the same day.
Evidence Found
- Police recovered two original nude photos on his phone, which had been duplicated into 144 copies — including enlarged close‑ups focusing on her breasts.
Prosecution & Defence Arguments
- Prosecution: He grossly violated her privacy and betrayed the trust of a father figure, making extra copies for sexual gratification. Urged 10–12 months’ imprisonment.
- Defence: Claimed the act was not premeditated, done with a simple mobile phone and “unsophisticated” method. Asked for 3 months 3 weeks’ jail.
Next Step
- The case is adjourned to Aug 24, 2026, for sentencing.
🔗 Full report: https://stmp.sg/z3cK
@stompteam
Woman jailed after drunkenly pulling maid’s hair and accusing her of child abuse
The incident started because the woman asked the maid to help look for her spectacles.
👓 https://stmp.sg/4YUb
@stompteam
Full Case Details: Woman jailed after drunkenly pulling maid’s hair and accusing her of child abuse
Published by: Cherry Tan, Stomp/The Straits Times
Date: Aug 2, 2026, 04:40am
Sentencing date: July 31, 2026
Sentence: 11 weeks’ jail
Conviction: Pleaded guilty to 3 offences; 9 other charges taken into consideration.
Background
The 32-year-old woman lived in a flat in western Singapore with her 58-year-old mother, two sons (aged 2 and 5 at the time), and a 28-year-old domestic helper.
First Incident – May 8, 2021
- She returned home at about 4pm, heavily intoxicated. Her sons were asleep; her mother and maid were having snacks in the living room.
- She asked the maid to find her spectacles. When the maid said she had left home wearing them, the woman refused to believe her and falsely accused the helper of physically abusing one of her sons.
- Both the maid and her mother denied and confirmed no abuse had occurred.
- The woman then pulled the maid’s hair twice. When the maid pushed her away in pain, her mother separated them and called the police. The woman left the flat before officers arrived.
Second Incident – Oct 17, 2021
- Months later, after drinking 2–3 bottles of beer at a Jurong coffee shop, she caused a disturbance. Police were called.
- When an officer tried to speak to her, she refused to cooperate, used vulgar language, and kicked the officer in the thigh and groin.
- While in the patrol car, she verbally abused a female officer, wriggled free from her seatbelt, and had to be restrained.
Psychiatric Assessment
- The Institute of Mental Health confirmed she has schizophrenia, but stated her condition had little or no bearing on her crimes.
- She was fully aware of her actions; her impaired judgment was due to excessive alcohol consumption, not her medical condition.
🔗 Full report: https://stomp.sg/trending-now/woman-jailed-after-drunkenly-pulling-maids-hair-and-accusing-her-child-abuse