Can consider having the ladies wear sports bra to work first?

That is mathematically accurate—if roughly 1 in 7 families make at least $30,000 a month, the other 6 out of 7 do not.   When looking at the income inequality gap, a widening or narrowing is typically measured using the **Gini coefficient** (where 0 is perfect equality and 1 is perfect inequality). While the dramatic jump in households earning $30,000+ (from 7.4% to 13.4%) highlights that the top tier is growing fast, the broader report points to a few factors regarding the overall gap:   ### 📊 Real Growth Across the Board    * **Rising Middle Class:** Over half of Singaporean households (51.6%) now earn at least $12,000 a month, indicating that it isn't just the ultra-wealthy moving up; a significant portion of the middle class experienced substantial income growth over the five-year period.    * **Lower-Income Growth:** Across all percentiles, household incomes grew in real, inflation-adjusted terms. However, the gap persists because higher-income brackets often experience faster compounding growth through investments and dual-income structures.   ### 🏛️ The Impact of Government Taxes and Transfers The data discussed in these household updates typically refers to **market income** before government intervention. In Singapore, the final income gap is usually significantly mitigated by progressive government redistribution:    * **The "Gini" Effect:**    Historically, while Singapore's *before-tax* income gap can look wide, the Gini coefficient drops noticeably after accounting for government transfers and subsidies (such as Workfare, CDC vouchers, and U-Save rebates) which heavily favor lower-to-middle-income families.   While the data clearly shows that a larger segment of the population is entering high-income brackets, the reality for the remaining 6 out of 7 households emphasizes why ongoing cost-of-living pressures and economic shifts remain a primary concern across the country.

Mean 6 out of 7 don't have an income of at least $30,000 a month, according to the latest General Household Survey.   Income inequality gap widen 

Almost 1 in 7 Singapore families have an income of at least $30,000 a month, according to the latest General Household Survey.   The median household market income for resident households here was $12,446 last year. More from the report:   https://str.sg/mEMa   The key findings and full details from the Singapore Department of Statistics' **General Household Survey 2025** report highlight major shifts in income, education, family dynamics, and homeownership over a five-year period (2020–2025):   ### 💰 Rising Household Income Trends    * **Surpassing the $12,000 Milestone:** For the first time, Singapore's median monthly household market income has exceeded the $12,000 mark, reaching **$12,446** in 2025. This is a substantial climb from $9,099 in 2020, representing a 3.2% annual growth in real terms after adjusting for inflation.    * **High-Income Surge ($30,000+):** Nearly 1 in 7 resident households (**13.4%**) recorded a monthly market income of $30,000 or more in 2025. This proportion has nearly doubled from the 7.4% recorded in 2020. *(Note: Market income includes both employment and non-employment earnings like investments and rental income).*    * **The Middle-Class Expansion ($12,000+):** More than half of Singapore's resident households (**51.6%**) now bring home at least $12,000 a month, a sharp rise from 38.2% in 2020.    * **Per Household Member Gains:** Accounting for smaller family sizes, the median monthly household income *per member* increased to **$4,160** in 2025, up from $2,952 in 2020.    * **Breakdown by Ethnic Groups:** All three major ethnic groups experienced inflation-adjusted income growth. Indian households logged the fastest annual increase at 3.5% (median $13,382), followed by Chinese households at 3.1% (median $12,969), and Malay households at 2.3% (median $8,581).   ### 👥 Changing Family & Marriage Dynamics    * **The Rise of Dual-Income Couples:** Dual-income marriages are becoming the standard in Singapore. In 2025, **56.6%** of married couples were dual-income earners (up from 52.5% in 2020). Conversely, single-income households where only the husband works fell from 24.9% to 21%.    * **More Young Adults Staying Single:** Singlehood among younger demographics continues to climb. The proportion of single women aged 25 to 29 rose to 73.4% (up from 69% in 2020), while single men aged 30 to 34 jumped to 47.6% (up from 41.9%).    * **Shrinking Family Sizes:** Married-couple households with children remain the most common structure, but overall family sizes have shrunk, and married women are having fewer children on average.   ### 🏠 Housing & Higher Education  * **Spike in Homeownership:**   Homeownership rates ticked upward, with **91.2%** of resident households owning their homes in 2025, compared with 87.9% in 2020.  * **Better Educated Population:** Education levels have steadily risen. Among residents aged 25 and older, **64.8%** possessed post-secondary or higher qualifications in 2025, up from 58.3% five years prior.   ### 🗣️ Shift in Language & Religion  * **Dominance of English:** English has further solidified its status as the language most frequently spoken at home among Singaporeans.    * **Rise of Non-Religious Affiliation:** The survey noted a distinct demographic shift toward secularism, with a larger share of residents reporting that they have no religious affiliation.  

🎧 Is Workers’ Party chief Pritam Singh stronger than ever? Singh dismissed talk that he would face a challenge to his position, and results from the party’s internal meetings showed that most members are still very much behind him.   What does this mean for the WP and has it turned the page on the saga involving Raeesah Khan? Join the discussion on The Usual Place podcast.    https://str.sg/8hNaq     The shared post refers to a special episode of *The Straits Times’* **The Usual Place** podcast, which analyzes the outcome of the Workers' Party (WP) critical June 28, 2026, Cadre Members' Conference.   The main details surrounding this political developments and the talking points featured in the podcast's discussion include: ### 🗳️ Core Context: The June 28 Cadre Voting Results    * **The Leadership Referendum:**  The special conference was forced by a requisition from 25 disgruntled WP cadres. They challenged Pritam Singh's suitability as leader following his criminal conviction and subsequent loss of the official Leader of the Opposition title. The cadres demanded he either step down, account for his actions, or face a secret vote.    * **Supermajority Mandate:** Rather than being ousted, Singh won an overwhelming supermajority in the secret ballot, securing roughly 79% to 80% of the votes from the 107 cadres present.    * **Re-elected Unopposed:** Following the confidence vote, Singh ran completely unopposed in the biennial Central Executive Committee (CEC) election, securing his fifth consecutive term as Secretary-General.   ### 🎙️ Key Discussion Points from *The Usual Place* Podcast The podcast unpacks what this definitive victory means for the future trajectory of Singapore's leading opposition party:    * **Is Pritam Singh Stronger Than Ever?** The hosts and political analysts discuss whether surviving a highly publicized criminal trial, parliamentary stripping of his title, and a direct internal coup attempt actually leaves Singh with a more unshakeable, bulletproof mandate than before.    * **Turning the Page on the Raeesah Khan Saga:** A major focus is whether this decisive closing of ranks means the WP has finally exorcised the ghost of the 2021 Raeesah Khan lying scandal, or if the "convicted liar" label will remain a political vulnerability.    * **Winning Over the Middle Ground:** The discussion analyzes the party’s next big hurdle. While the core WP cadres and hardcore loyalists have united solidly behind Singh, the panel explores whether his conviction will alienate more moderate, risk-averse middle-ground voters in future elections.    * **The Failure of Internal Factions:** The episode evaluates why the unhappy cadres were unable to rally around a credible alternative candidate, pointing to a lack of viable replacement leaders and the heavy, stabilizing influence of party veteran Low Thia Khiang.