SINGAPORE – The Workers’ Party has declined Prime Minister Lawrence Wong’s invitation to nominate another elected MP to the position of Leader of the Opposition (LO).
In a statement posted on its website on Jan 21, the opposition party said it has told PM Wong its decision.
The WP added that it takes the view that the leader of the largest opposition party in Parliament is the leader of the Opposition.
This follows PM Wong’s decision to remove WP chief Pritam Singh from the position on Jan 15, citing Mr Singh’s court convictions and a Parliament motion which found him unsuitable for the role.
In a letter to PM Wong dated Jan 21, WP’s leadership said the party was “unable to accept” his invitation to nominate another elected MP to the post as it has its own established processes for electing its leaders.
“In Singapore, the position of LO is a discretionary appointment that the Prime Minister makes,” it noted.
“Despite not having any constitutional or statutory eligibility criteria, we hold the view that the only tenable candidate for the LO position would be a Member of Parliament who is the leader of the largest opposition in Parliament, the Workers’ Party.”
In a statement issued on Jan 21, the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) said the Government accepts the WP’s decision. It added that the office of the LO will remain vacant till the WP is “ready to nominate someone to take on this responsibility”.
The WP said in its statement that the appointment is conventionally extended to the leader of the largest opposition party in Parliament, or decided by the opposition party in question.
“To this end, it is important to reiterate that the LO appointment in Parliament arose out of the political success of the opposition at the ballot box.
“It is the people’s vote that explains the presence of opposition MPs in Parliament.”
The party cited other Westminster parliamentary systems where the title of the LO is established by law and “is not the prerogative or choice of the government of the day or the prime minister”.
This approach expresses the authority and sanctity of the people’s vote, it said.
The party noted that the establishment of the office of the LO had been a step forward in Singapore’s political development.
The recognition of a Leader of the Opposition in Parliament was introduced by the PAP government in 2020, “ostensibly as a result of a recognition of the strong desire among Singaporeans for a greater diversity of views in politics”, it said.
“We continue to focus on our primary duty, to work for Singaporeans and provide a rational, responsible and respectable check on the Government,” it said.
In 2020, then Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong had appointed Mr Singh as LO. PM Wong reappointed Mr Singh to the role following the general election in May 2025.
The PMO said in its statement that the leader of the main opposition party in Parliament is indeed the natural choice to serve as LO, but noted the exceptional circumstances with Mr Singh criminally convicted of lying to Parliament and the House finding that his conviction and conduct render him unsuitable to continue in the role.
The WP has also formed a disciplinary panel to assess if Mr Singh breached its party Constitution, following his conviction in court. The panel comprises Sengkang GRC MPs He Ting Ru and Jamus Lim and former Hougang MP Png Eng Huat, according to party sources.
PM Wong had said on Jan 15 that Mr Singh’s convictions and the view expressed by the House meant it was “no longer tenable” for him to continue in the role.
He said his decision was necessary to uphold the rule of law, as well as the dignity and integrity of Parliament.
This meant that Mr Singh no longer has the privileges of the position, which included the right of first reply during parliamentary debates, more time for his speeches and twice the allowance of an elected MP.
The move came a day after the House on Jan 14 approved a motion raised by Leader of the House Indranee Rajah. The motion said Mr Singh’s conduct and court conviction in relation to former WP MP Raeesah Khan’s lie in Parliament in 2021 meant that he had fallen short of the requirements and standards expected of an LO.
All PAP MPs and Nominated MPs agreed to the motion, while the 11 WP MPs present in the House dissented.
PM Wong had on Jan 15 also invited the WP through a letter to its top decision-making body to nominate another elected MP to serve as the next LO.
He specified that the nominee should not have been implicated in the earlier findings of the Committee of Privileges that looked into Ms Khan’s case, and that the person nominated must also be able to meet the high standards expected of the office.
“I hope to receive their nomination soon, so that this important position in our parliamentary democracy will not remain vacant for too long,” PM Wong said.