Jump to content

International Olympic Committee Considers Postponing Tokyo Games


The_King

Recommended Posts

The International Olympic Committee on Sunday said it is considering postponing the Tokyo 2020 Games, bowing to the reality of the worsening novel coronavirus pandemic and growing pressure from athletes, sports federations and public health leaders to delay its multibillion-dollar centerpiece event.

The statement brought a swift response from participating nations that made clear that circumstances have already overtaken the IOC’s deliberations. Later on Sunday, both Canada’s Olympic and Paralympic Committees and Australian Olympic Committee said they wouldn’t send athletes to the Games if held this summer. Australia told its athletes to prepare for a Tokyo Games in the northern summer of 2021.

In a statement, the Australian Olympic Committee said its executive board had concluded “an Australian Team could not be assembled in the changing circumstances at home and abroad.”

The IOC has been criticized for taking a full-steam-ahead approach to the Games’ July 24 start date, failing to acknowledge the possibility of a delay despite a rising global death toll and the shutdown of many nations’ athletic-training facilities.

 

It changed course on Sunday by saying it would assess the world-wide health situation and consult with the Tokyo 2020 Organizing Committee, Japanese authorities and the Tokyo Metropolitan Government. The IOC didn’t detail possible postponement scenarios but said cancellation isn’t being considered.

And it signaled that a decision isn’t imminent, either, by saying it was confident it would complete the discussions within the next four weeks.

Whatever the outcome, moving the Games would be a complicated and disruptive event for a large number of constituencies. They include athletes whose training has been sidelined; broadcasters such as NBC, who pay huge sums for broadcasting rights; sponsors who make the Olympics a focal point of their marketing; and other sports organizations, who might find themselves competing with the IOC for new dates when the sports world one day moves toward playing games again.

 

 

The IOC’s move came on the heels of USA Swimming, USA Track & Field and others calling for the U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Committee to use its influence with the IOC to postpone Tokyo 2020.

The Canadian Olympic Committee and Canadian Paralympic Committee said late Sunday that they would not send teams to the Tokyo Games this summer, concluding it would not be safe for the athletes and their families. “This is not solely about athlete health—it is about public health,” both committees said, calling for the Games to be delayed by a year.

Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe said Monday he supported the IOC’s decision. He said canceling the Games was “out of the question” and reiterated that he didn’t want to scale back the event or hold it without spectators.

The IOC’s statement “is in line with what I have said about holding the Games in their complete form. If that is difficult, we should think of the athletes first, and we would have no choice but to make the decision to postpone,” Mr. Abe said in Parliament.

Public health officials also have begun speaking forcefully on the matter. Lawrence Gostin, the director of the World Health Organization’s center on global health law, said in an interview with The Wall Street Journal on Sunday that the Games couldn’t go on in July and that he was making that argument strongly within the organization, which the IOC has said is its chief source of expertise.

 

“No one could say with any degree of confidence that the situation globally will be better,” Mr. Gostin said. “Even if you’re on the downturn in Asia and Japan, it would be on the upswing in many parts of the world. I could see the U.S. and Canada near peaking, and possibly in Mexico. I could see the curve of the pandemic on the way up in sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East.

“Since this is a global event it would be the height of folly to consider going forward, and that’s if the borders opened, travel restrictions lifted and the airlines started flying.

 

In its statement, the IOC said the “dramatic increase in cases and new outbreaks” led its executive board to conclude it needs to “take the next step in its scenario-planning.”

World Athletics, the international governing body of track and field, said it welcomed discussions about postponement. Han Xiao, chairman of the USOPC’s Athletes’ Advisory Council, said the IOC’s acknowledgment that postponement is an option and its timeline to shape scenarios is “a step in the right direction. We’re looking forward to more information and continued transparency over the following four-week period.”

In the event of postponement, the debate will shift to just how long the IOC should wait to hold the Games safely.

 

Public health experts have mixed perspectives on the best new date. While some said the fall of 2020 could work, others, such as Gostin, worry about the legacy of the 1918 influenza pandemic, in which the deadliest period came after restrictions were lifted because cases had dropped.

Dr. Carlos Del Rio, head of Emory University’s global-health department and chairman of the National Collegiate Athletic Association’s Covid-19 advisory panel, agreed that the threat of reversing any headway made against transmission might necessitate postponing the Games for a full year. “We are really in uncharted territory,” he said.

William Schaffner, a Vanderbilt University professor of preventive medicine who also served on that advisory panel, said that 2022, not 2021, would be preferable. By then, he said, there was a stronger likelihood that the Games could take place in a setting where a vaccine had been brought online and everyone attending had received it, he said.

The summer of 2022 might also give the Games a clearer runway—particularly since they won’t have to compete with the 2022 soccer World Cup in Qatar that winter.

Any postponement shorter than a year, meanwhile, could put the IOC squarely in a crush of rescheduled events this fall, plus the National Football League, playoff baseball, and European soccer—a scenario sure to be opposed by the Games’ major broadcast-rights holders around the world.

 

Beyond scheduling concerns, any delay is certain to scramble the plan for Tokyo 2020 sites after the Games. The main athletes’ village is slated to be sold as private accommodation after the Games, and thousands of Olympic volunteers and staff who assumed their work would be done by August 2020 would have to be reassembled or re-recruited.

Athletes, however, believe that a postponement is the only path to a seemingly normal Olympics from a competitive standpoint. Training schedules around the world have already been thrown into disarray. Global antidoping efforts have also been severely reduced due to a lack of events and out of concern for testers’ safety.

The decision to take four weeks to contemplate postponement does buy some time for the IOC to rally members around the idea as more data appears, something that board member Dick Pound advocated in an interview with The Wall Street Journal on Saturday.

 

“I think the IOC is pretty determined to hold the course until a direction appears,” Pound said. “You can imagine what the reaction would be if we got it wrong.”

 

https://www.wsj.com/articles/international-olympic-committee-considers-postponing-tokyo-games-11584904096

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Mugentech.net uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By using this site you agree to Privacy Policy